Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Gangsta-Easter-Bunny/policy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep, but mark "rejected". Xoloz 16:19, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:Gangsta-Easter-Bunny/policy

Wikipedia is not a democracy, there is already ArbCom so we don't need a supreme court, admins make all the decisions around here anyway, voting is evil. Quentin Smith 18:03, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete --Quentin Smith 18:03, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• I was about to recommend getting the author to tag it with {{db-author}} (because this will ensure both that a lesson is imparted and that there are no hard feelings; it can be a rude shock to find something no longer exists), but since many people have chimed in on the talk commenting on how ridiculous this is, delete. Johnleemk | Talk 18:18, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and tag as {{rejected}}. Every editor should be allowed to propose policy changes, and the rejection of a proposal isn't grounds for deletion. --TantalumTelluride 20:22, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - it's in userspace, and nothing links to it. --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 01:02, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep but reject the policy (This guy seems to think Wikipedia should be run systematicly). Harmless and a subapge. The Gerg 03:37, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I see no reason to keep this "proposal". Arbusto 04:29, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as per all rejected policy Ydam 10:52, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as per Ydam --Zer0faults 17:18, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep but reject per TantalumTelluride. Gwernol 23:40, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep but reject. Computerjoe's talk 10:34, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as rejected. FreplySpang 13:41, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Guys, its already rejected...--Osbus 15:15, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, rejected. --Terence Ong 14:46, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.