Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Clan rHrN

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep the page as it is now, but Delete the offensive content in its history. Xoloz 16:52, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:Clan rHrN

ATTENTION! If you came here because somebody asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus amongst Wikipedia editors on whether an article is suitable for this encyclopedia. We have policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting heads (or socks). You can participate and give your opinion. Please sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Happy editing! Note to editors: Comments made by suspected single purpose accounts should be tagged using <small>— Possible '''[[Wikipedia:Single purpose account|single purpose account]]''': [[User:username|username]] ([[User talk:username|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/username|contribs]]) {{{2|}}} has made little or no other contributions outside this topic.</small>.

• Delete. This user is using his page as a personal publishing site. I am aware that I did vandalize this page once, but I now regret making that choice. I promise not to vandalize any more articles and keep the project clean. Ianthegecko 19:42, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Don't break Wikipedia rules. --DannyDaWriter 01:47, 29 July 2006 (UTC) (Aka. Magna Carta)

• • Like 70.191.189.155, I am removing my "delete" vote, for now anyway. Like 70.191.189.155 I'm glad you removed the whole HRWiki forum attacks. Still, like 70.191.189.155 I reserve the right to reinstate my vote, if/when this discussion ends and you repost those attacks.68.62.229.65 06:41, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • User's 15th edit. Kimchi.sg 22:38, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, WP:NPA. - Mailer Diablo 08:42, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• DeleteI would like to see proof that this is all accurate.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.109.118.24 (talk • contribs).
  • User's 5th edit. Kimchi.sg 22:38, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Delete. {WP:USER}.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.225.166.177 (talk • contribs).
  • User's 1st edit. Kimchi.sg 22:38, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• Not Delete: Just replace the attacking words with a different word. Clan rHrN 01:02, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • I would find this acceptible if and only if Clan were to remove all references to HRWiki, HRWiki Forum, and their membership (which would include Jello B, Shippinator Mandy, Didymus, Ian the Gecko, and any other HRWiki members), from this and every other page in which he has made entries concerning them. This would include his Psycho Bonus Stage entry.70.191.189.155 02:38, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Thank you, Clan, for deleting those offensive remarks. However, I would like some assurance that you will not simply revert them or make more personal attacks once this discussion is finished. An apology to the HRWiki people would also be nice. Furthermore, I notice that you still have Shippinator Mandy on your Psycho Bonus Stage entry, and unless you have permission from her to leave it there, I'd like to see it removed as well. The simple truth is, Clan, it was this sort of behavior that got you banned from the HRWiki to start with. You are not helping yourself or anyone else by continuing this grudge of yours. Your best bet is to simply drop it and move on with your life.--70.191.189.155 04:08, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
    • For now, I'm removing my Delete vote. However, I'm not going to vote to keep it unless I get some assurance that this grudge against the HRWiki Forum is dropped. --70.191.189.155 05:37, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
      • User has 5 edits, all to this MfD. Kimchi.sg 08:57, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, there is offensive material on it. 82 03:01, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep now that offending remarks has been removed. The page now just reads like a self-deprecating autobiography, and within the acceptable bounds of user page content. Closing admin please keep in mind that this MfD has been heavily sock/meatpuppeted. Kimchi.sg 08:57, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • We are not sock puppeting. We are different people from the HRWiki. Ianthegecko 01:08, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Ian, I think what he means is that a lot of the people who've posted "delete" here are people who haven't really contributed much to wikipedia. If that's the case, it's an accurate statement.68.62.229.65 01:41, 31 July 2006 (UTC)-[SR, HR Wiki Forum]
• Keep per Kimchi.sg. In its current state, the page is even more innoucuous and non-controversial than many user pages. -Seidenstud 12:21, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Keep in mind he's still somewhat using it as a hosting site. Wikipedia is not one. --72.70.14.249 19:21, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Can you tell me in exactly what way is he using it as a web host? It now has one para describing himself in a strange way, and a list of "his" pages, and nothing else. Quite normal for Wikipedia user pages - they describe the Wikipedia activities of the editor. Kimchi.sg 16:50, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
    • "Clan's Pages" do not describe his Wikipedia activities. He only mentions 3 strategies on his "Full list" of Pokémon strategies, and only one of those has an actual page. Ianthegecko 21:47, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Delete--24.175.162.135 22:48, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

• Reason? Ianthegecko 00:17, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.