Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Blisz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete Steve block talk 00:04, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:Blisz

I ask for deletion of User:Blisz, User:Blisz/Dossier George McFinnigan and User:Blisz/Más noticias, as well as any other similar pages that user would create. They are written in spanish and are only related to the spanish wikipedia, where this user is banned [1] and is vandalizing different pages everyday from several proxys. Now, it uses this page at en: trying to evade us see [2], [3].

At his user page it starts with: "AQUÍ LOS INCOMPETENTES BIBLIOTECARIOS DE LA WIKI ESPAÑOLA NO TENÉIS PODER PARA SEGUIR VANDALIZANDO MIS PÁGINAS PERSONALES :)" which means: "Here, incompetent eswiki's sysops don't have power enough to go on vandalizing my user pages".

They are attacks against user George McFinnigan and its irisnesh. It is usually done on user / user discussion pages althugh random articles don't escape.

Vandalism against George McFinnigan user page: [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]

Against North ireland: [12], [13], [14], [15]

Thus i ask to the english community support against this vandal (BTW: it seems his english user account is only used for his complaints, no article edit made).

Platonides 15:23, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

I add User:George McFinnigan to the list as they clearly state on that page (in spanish again) that this was an account solely created to "llamar la atención" to pretending to be him, so that account should be blocked too.

I got my user page vandalized by User:Seanver (a friend of that), but they don't even try to explain why this pages shouldn't be deleted. Doesn't sound strange?

Platonides 17:21, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete all. Whatever is going on here, the user in question has made contributions to En. outside of his user page. Useless, apparently provocative. Xoloz 01:19, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above -- Shimirel ^(Talk) 03:51, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.