Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Auckland

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Xoloz 15:24, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Portal:Auckland

Portal under construction, but no edits since 15 August, and the sole contributor has not edited since 18 August - about 6 weeks ago. Auckland may warrant a portal at some point in the future, but at present there appears to be no one interested in maintaining such a portal. I'd prefer for the portal to be deleted than left to rot.- gadfium 22:59, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Joe I 23:19, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - no sign of activity, and - though it's a hopping portal - there's no sign that the NZ portal is currently overburdened. Grutness...wha? 23:52, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per gadfium and Grutness above. Badbilltucker 15:14, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Avenue 09:52, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 20:22, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.