Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Asia/Selected biography
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion | Portal:Asia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Xoloz 12:26, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Portal:Asia/Selected biography
As of now, being a maintainer of Portal:Asia, I don't see the point of having both a selected article and a selected biography section. Also, why a biography section? Why not a selected history or geography section? (Please note though, that I was the original creator of the section, but I'm having second thoughts on its purpose...)--☆TBC☆ (aka Tree Biting Conspiracy) 04:09, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. If the page's creator and pretty much only editor says it's inactive, then it's inactive. It doesn't have any unique content. --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 09:41, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, couldn't we stick a {{db-author}} on it? Kimchi.sg 13:18, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- Comment, I'm not sure, are we allowed to use the {{db-author}} tag for portal pages?--TBCTaLk?!? 16:28, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Selected article and selected biography are used, to great effect (in my opinion!) on the politics portal. However, I think the nom. is right for Asia selected history or geography section would be better suited. --Wisden17 20:04, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete can the {{db-author}} tag be used? --Arnzy (whats up?) 12:54, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.