Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/MediaWiki talk:Triism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy deleted per G1 and G8 by Cbrown1023 —Dgies^t c 18:02, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] MediaWiki talk:Triism

This article is in the wrong name space and is complete bogus, same author as this one yesterday: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/MediaWiki talk:Treeite Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 23:05, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy delete - WP:CSD#G8 and possibly WP:CSD#G4 (I didn't see the first page). Gracenotes^T § 00:13, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - A Google search on triism brings up comments such as "We could have dualism, triism, quartism, quintism, through n-ism" and "Triism: soul, mind, and body." Google books brings up more information. Triism might be a legitimate topic, but the information provided in MediaWiki talk:Triism seems to be a hoax. The user page User:Thoril_Iendithas mentions a triism article, which was deleted on 25 October 2006. MediaWiki talk:Triism could be a WP:CSD#G4 recreation of deleted material. (FYI, I deleted unsourced, potentially libelous material from the article per WP:BLP). -- Jreferee 05:04, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete G8. By the way, I just tagged MediaWiki talk:Tip Top, Arizona (edit|message|history|links|watch|logs) for G8 too, although it has a different author. What is with all these unusual MediaWiki talk creations recently? --ais523 16:36, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.