Wikipedia:Miscellaneous deletion/Log/2005-10-14
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] 2005-10-14
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. - Mailer Diablo 17:49, 31 October 2005 (UTC) speedy deleted. (Ambi deleted "Wikipedia:WikiProject Inclusion" (an organisation that openly seeks to push a POV has no basis on wikipedia)
[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Inclusion
This is a WikiProject that barely got off the ground, with no talk page, no practical description of what they do, and only two members. No activity for the past couple of months. Its goal seems rather hazy since all WikiProjects are about inclusion one way or the other. They're just more specific. Radiant_>|< 18:46, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
- Weak keep only because there is a little too much irony in having this page up for deletion. The AIW is active enough that I could envision this waking up. Xoloz 15:18, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, while all of the nominator's comments are true, I don't see what they have to do with deleting this page. Christopher Parham (talk) 08:00, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep This is a relatively new project. It is not yet fully organized, however it needs time to grow. In fact, this nomination itself illustrates the obsession of the deletionist campaign. Canadianism 19:06, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. I trust we all appreciate the irony of an inclusionist project page appearing on AfD? Radagast 03:14, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, because we need to keep those darn deletionists in line somehow! ;-) GreenReaper 05:30, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: It seems that this WikiProject's goals are being carried out at m:Association of Inclusionist Wikipedians. Is the "local chapter" really needed on the English Wikipedia since the Meta-Wiki Association involves only English-speaking Wikipeidans? I'm undecided. It would be a shame to delete WikiProject Inclusion. Then again, the project is redundant. After all, I'm a Wikipedian Who Dislikes Making Broad Judgements About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Is In Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean He is a Deletionist. This is a tough decision. --TantalumTelluride 18:53, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd(?!?) 01:30, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Text of the GNU Free Documentation License/temp
Apparent fork of Wikipedia:Text of the GNU Free Documentation License. Or possibly a rewrite, since it doesn't have a talk page it's hard to tell. I don't think we should have variant duplicates of official policy pages, it's confusing. Radiant_>|< 10:24, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
- The original author's intent for this temp page is documented at Wikipedia talk:Text of the GNU Free Documentation License#my proposals. If he/she is still working on it, I'm inclined to give it the benefit of doubt. If it's now a dead page, well, it's still doing no harm and I'd prefer a redirect than a deletion. Has anyone contacted Ixfd64 yet? Rossami (talk) 12:48, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
- I saw the title and thought "of all the things to be a copyvio!". defer until Ixfd64 gets a say. Grutness...wha? 01:46, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- I'm not working on it anymore. You can delete it if you want. --Ixfd64 03:33, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no vote recorded. - Mailer Diablo 17:52, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Copyrights/e
Apparent fork of Wikipedia:Copyrights. Or possibly a rewrite, since it doesn't have a talk page it's hard to tell. I don't think we should have variant duplicates of official policy pages, it's confusing. Radiant_>|< 10:18, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
- Also created by Ixfd64 who briefly explained his/her reason at Wikipedia talk:Copyrights#Editable version. Abstain for now. Rossami (talk) 12:51, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing that out. IXFD claims that "This can be used to propose changes by non-admins". However, that is not a very good point imho since non-admins can always see the source of a permaprotected page, and should of course propose changes in some public place like the VP or AN. Radiant_>|< 13:22, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- As somebody new to WP reading up on policy, this page was confusing to me. Ixfd64's purpose is nowhere evident on the page, and as Radiant points out, there are other venues for discussion of policy. Just my $.02. Kiaparowits 20:27, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Supercession by events/redirect. Xoloz 05:51, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Template messages/Stubs/Sports
Overlooked when all the other stub message subpages were deletedredirected a couple of weeks back. Deleteredirected this one too. Grutness...wha? 06:10, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Xoloz 17:45, 14 October 2005 (UTC)Apparently superceded by events. Xoloz 05:51, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
