Wikipedia:Miscellaneous deletion/Log/2005-10-04
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] 2005-10-04
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was that it be deleted. Warofdreams talk 10:58, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] User:MMORPG research
This is not a proper user page - there is no User with that name. It is a page created by User:Highbreed. By its own admission it is original research (OR) but since it is in user space that may not be sufficient grounds for deletion. But since it is OR we can propose deletion on the grounds that Wikipedia is not a free host or webspace provider. See also discussion of a clone of this page: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Highbreed. -- RHaworth 03:14, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
I DID NOT ASK THAT MY PAGE BE DELETED I gave away my username and password away so that they can either disambiguate or split my article but It seems they've used it to go to protected restricted areas of my page to vandalize what I have said and now it has been deleted. /sob /sob GOODBYE TO MY HARDWORK AND LABOUR OF GATHERING THAT VALUABLE INFORMATION All the hardwork and sacrifice gone in a flash! I guess it can't be retrieve again. Bye bye to wikipedia. So long. It's been nice meeting yah all. Say hi to all the Cambridge professors for me okay. Bye Oyasumi Nasai
-
- Like I stated before, we don't need your password in order to be able to edit the page; anyone is already able to edit, split or disambiguate your page. Also, if the user MMORPG doesn't exist, then I believe we should indeed delete this userpage. Also, Wikipedia is not a battleground, so please remain civil. -- SoothingR 13:25, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete original research. Also, says it was sourced from a website. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:05, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete User pages are for real users, not fake users. Xoloz 22:27, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
Ahehe I copied this page already and transfered it to a hard drive. No need to worry. Ahehehehe BYE BYE WIKIPEDIA. This is my last message.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy merge content with attribution, and delete -- BD2412 talk 11:55, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Talk talk:List of solar system objects by radius
Not an article. Apparent mistake, perhaps from a broken merge template; there is no "talk talk" namespace. This article is in the main namespace with the title "Talk talk:List of...", which is clearly undesirable. — brighterorange (talk) 01:01, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
- Strange. This was obviously never intended to be an article. I doubt the author would have any problem with my recommendation to Delete. --CastAStone 01:08, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete As you said, obviously this was not intentially posted as an article. will381796 01:20, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
- Right, therefore I'm moving this to MfD. -- BD2412 talk 01:26, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
- Really? This is in the article namespace, so shouldn't it be deleted at AfD? — brighterorange (talk) 01:36, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
- It's not an attempt to make an article, tho - it's an attempt to make a talk page - why have it in article space if the criteria for discussing articles won't apply? -- BD2412 talk
- Actually, it's pretty clear that the editor who made this intended to post something to Talk:List of Solar system objects by radius - this should be a speedy merge of content/edit history and deletion of the resulting redirect. -- BD2412 talk 01:42, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
- ...and now I've moved what was on this page to the intended destination, dropping a note attributing the content to the original author (as a redundant courtesy, as he had signed it already). This can be speedied. -- BD2412 talk 01:48, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
- Really? This is in the article namespace, so shouldn't it be deleted at AfD? — brighterorange (talk) 01:36, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.