User talk:Miss Critic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I am not amused by yet another display of sockpuppetry, User:Fame live4ever. Makemi 17:40, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
- What are you all talking about? Are you all so severe that you see it fit to make unprovable and outlandish accusations? I find some of you very immature and you seem merely doing this to express your power. You all are being very unreasonable, as I have no idea who that person is. At this point I really could careless of your opinion and though I wish I could resort to namecalling I shall refain from that as I seem more...should I say 'enlightened' then you seem with your strange need of control and refusal to see the beneficial evidence that proves her, indeed valid. I have noted that some of you have cheered in the absence of a "spamer" as you have labeled them, how fairly I shall not jest. In witnessing this I now express the concern that you do not read any of my posts, and I am also stating here that I shall not leave rest until some decency is shown. User:Fame live4ever
Hi, Christina. Decided to come back and try again? Fan-1967 23:25, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Please do not remove legitimate warnings from your talk page or replace them with inappropriate content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted legitimate comments. If you continue to remove or vandalize legitimate warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks.
- I have removed all non-legitimate warnings as I am not the the girl they claim me to be, and they were people who were stalking me online. I have a right to delete that so they can't find harass me more, and that's all I've done. Miss Critic 20:45, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Last warning
If you continue to blank your talk pages and trying to hide evidence of your lies and sockpuppetry, I will block you and your socks for disruption. Mak (talk) 20:53, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
-
- They've been restored. You're free to claim the warnings aren't true (though no one will believe you) but you're not free to remove them.
- Let's look at the history of the last few weeks:
- If you wanted to try to convince people that you're not the same person, showing up repeatedly under both names, repeatedly, within a few minutes of each other, is not the way to do it.
- And don't even think about trying to recreate your Christina Ritter hoax. Fan-1967 20:55, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
- My sister and I use the same computer. She used my account to act like an idiot. My parents have already grounded her and I had nothing to do with it. These accusations are for Fame live4ever. that's her account. So comment these things here, and I should have the right to delete whats here because it was not me who did that. You should copy and paste all these comments on Fame live4evers page, and let me delete this as I had nothing to do with it.
- Why not? I'd like some actual reasoning for my simple request. It seems perfectly logical to me. Miss Critic 19:24, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- You obviously aren't very logical. My sister gets a turn on the computer after I and I don't control when she gets on. You have no evidence to reasonably make such accusations. Siblings usually share the same computer in a household, and I have my turn and then she, or I'm doing chores while she get's her turn, and vice versa. You also aren't very bright to make such brash accusations without checking your facts. The information you've provided thus far has not been verifiable and I believe you need to rethink your accusations.Miss Critic 22:54, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 |
This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia. (see: block log • contributions • page moves • current autoblocks) |
