Talk:Misconduct (football)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
The article on Misconduct (football) is supported by the WikiProject on Football, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of football (soccer) related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ. |
|---|---|
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. |
Contents |
[edit] Proposed merge
See Talk:Yellow card#Proposed Merge With Red card
- This merge was in fact performed. --rhaas 12:28, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Move to 'Misconduct (football (soccer))' like all association football articles. Skinnyweed 16:48, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- That's simply not true, see Football_(soccer)#See_also. – Smyth\talk 16:44, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- When a parenthetical disambig is used, the format TOPIC (football) is usually used; when it is inline then the soccer may be used, e.g. Football (soccer) TOPIC. This seems to work well; no need to make it more complex especially when disambiguation is not really required. --Daveb 09:26, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Team gets 5 yellow cards in one game
Don't some competitions fine teams that incur more than four yellow cards in one game? Xiner (talk, email) 04:57, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Cards
Why does it stands cautioned in the text when a player gets an yellow card? In every football computergame, the commentants says that this player gets an yellow card. Now he's booked insted of the player is cautioned? Doesn't it named "booking" or "booked" when a player gets an yellow card?
[edit] Sent off
Sent off gets redirected here.. the title of the article says football, but it's only about soccer. Sending off is also used in the rugby codes, linking to here is meaningless for those uses. Fixed.
