User talk:Mirror Vax
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Steve Wozniak
Please, stop reverting. I am correcting the information in the article. Wozniak did not design Breakout, Nolan Bushnell did. Woz programmed it. While Steve Jobs was working at Atari, Bushnell asked if he could do, he said yes, and then asked Woz if he could help him out. Woz ended out coding the original. How can "nobody" not program a game, if it had not been programmed, it would not exist. I do know what programming means, I am a programmer in my spare time. You should also read some books on the subject, such as Infinite Loop by Michael S.Malone which speaks of the topic when Jobs was working at Atari and got Woz to program the original Breakout for Bushnell. Breakout was hardware and software, you know. Maybe it should say 'programmed and designed' for Atari/Bushnell or something similar. — Wackymacs 11:32, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- You obviously never bothered to read the breakout article. It states, correctly, that breakout was not a CPU-based game - it had no software. None. Hence nobody programmed it. Mirror Vax 11:36, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- If there was no software, then what displayed anything on the screen, hmm? You've just said it was not CPU based. So it wasnt hardware or software, ehh? You make no sense. hardware still has to be programmed, by the way. Some of the earliest programming was in hardware. — Wackymacs 11:45, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- OK forget all this, I've replaced the word with "developed" instead of programmed or designed, no problem now. — Wackymacs 14:05, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- If there was no software, then what displayed anything on the screen, hmm? You've just said it was not CPU based. So it wasnt hardware or software, ehh? You make no sense. hardware still has to be programmed, by the way. Some of the earliest programming was in hardware. — Wackymacs 11:45, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The Print Shop
Are you absolutely sure you know an Amiga release? I only found references to the C64. -- Polluks 15:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- Yes. See [1]. Or search groups.google.com. [2]. Mirror Vax 18:32, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- You are kidding! One reference without price :-7 Did you really read any of the postings? C'mon! -- Polluks 17:38, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- BTW your first reference says "C-64 only had 48k", do you consider him trustworthy?
- You are right. Sorry. I probably confused Print Shop with Deluxe Print. Mirror Vax 18:28, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- Hmm, how about an article Deluxe Print? http://amiga.emucamp.com/dprint2.htm -- Polluks 12:08, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Template:AfdAnons
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Nufy8 18:35, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
- Please don't try and pass that off as a legimate edit. Deliberate misinformation is vandalism. And please don't remove my warnings on your talk page. Nufy8 18:42, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --MONGO 18:44, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Nufy8 18:53, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
- I defy you to point to any "misinformation". As it happens, the truth is very nearly the opposite of what the template stated - but that's not my fault, is it? Why don't you block whomever wrote the grossly misleading nonsense about AFD not being a vote? Mirror Vax 19:00, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Anthraxmailbox.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Anthraxmailbox.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 17:10, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Turrican.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Turrican.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:12, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
