Talk:Minnesota State Capitol
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, which aims to improve all articles related to Minnesota. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| High | This article is on a subject of High-importance within Minnesota articles. | |
|
This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
||
 |
This article is within the scope of the National Register of Historic Places WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of listings on the U.S. National Register of Historic Places. |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject U.S. state capitols, a WikiProject which aims to expand coverage of the various capitols and state houses of U.S. states on Wikipedia. Please feel free to join us. |
[edit] Title
Every article listed in the U.S. state capitols category is named "_____ State Capitol" or "_____ State House". Every link to this article is pointing to "Minnesota State Capitol". Most importantly, people call it the Minnesota State Capitol, even if it's a bit redundant. Wikipedia policy is to use the common name. Based on all that, I think the article should stay where it is now. Jonathunder 04:50, 2005 Apr 23 (UTC)
If it is Wikipedia policy to use the name that it is called, why is the Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis under Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis? EdwinHJ | Talk 00:17, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- "Use common name" is the general rule, but some categories have their own, more specific, conventions. Jonathunder 05:28, 2005 Apr 24 (UTC)
[edit] Content
It is stated "Equally, he managed to avoid any reference to a palace block that would have been offensive to Minnesotans." While that's interesting, it leaves the reader wondering WHY that would be offensive to Minnesotans.
