Talk:Ming official headwear

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fashion WikiProject This article is within the scope of the Fashion WikiProject. Please work to improve this article, or visit our project page to find other ways of helping. Thanks!
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article is on a subject of low-importance within fashion.
It is requested that a image or images be included in this article to improve its quality.

Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

This article is part of WikiProject China, a project to improve all China-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other China-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale. (add comments)

[edit] illustration needed

A drawing or ancient painting is needed. I can't find one... --Menchi 00:53, 25 Apr 2004 (UTC)


[edit] Spelling

Shouldn't this be "headwear" and not "headware"? DopefishJustin 01:28, Apr 25, 2004 (UTC)

This is odd. There are like 20,000 Google hits for such words, but neither OED nor Merriam-Webster has this word. Maybe this is an extremely common misspelling? --Menchi 01:47, 25 Apr 2004 (UTC)
I suppose it must be influenced by words like "hardware" and "software", which are obviously very common nowadays. There are 800 000 hits for headwear (v. 20 000 for headware), so as you say it looks like a common misspelling. I've made redirects to headgear for all the spellings I could think of. I just googled for footware and footwear - a similar result with 100 000 hits for footware and 7 million for footwear. :)
PS, I moved it since we all seem to be in agreement that headware is a spelling mistake (albeit a common one). fabiform | talk 09:53, 25 Apr 2004 (UTC)