User talk:Mikecraig

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a Wikipedia user talk page. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mikecraig.

This is the User talk page for Mikecraig

Please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~). Place comments that start a new topic at the bottom of the page by starting a new thread. If you're new to Wikipedia, please see Welcome to Wikipedia and frequently asked questions.

Talk page guidelines Please respect Wikiquette, assume good faith and be nice, and bear in mind what Wikipedia is not.

Archives Oct 2005-Nov 2006 Nov 2006-Feb 2007

Contents 1 Images 2 Userboxes 3 You seem familiar, MTC? 4 Jack Awards 5 Personal Attacks 6 Get This Guest Hosts 7 Lukas Rossi Edits 8 Flags 9 Image:Axlepublicityten.jpg 10 Image:Bondiburger.jpg 11 Notability of Will & Lehmo

[edit] Images

Fixed a number of images and posted them in various articles. --Mikecraig 04:33, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Userboxes

Sounds like you're a TV nut like me! Have a look at mine! --Ninevah 04:21, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Lol..that's pretty impressive! --Mikecraig 04:23, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] You seem familiar, MTC?

Have you ever worked in Bourke St Melbourne near Southern Cross Station? Feel free to email your response if privacy is a concern. -- Longhair\^talk 23:02, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Around that area a few years ago...how long are ago are you thinking ? --Mikecraig 23:14, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

1998 onwards. -- Longhair\^talk 23:17, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

I was in Sydney at that time, but after 2001 onwards I was floating between Sydney and Melbourne for work and personal. --Mikecraig 23:34, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Wrong guy :) The initials MTC would have given it away. Apologies. You appeared to be an old work mate of mine ;) -- Longhair\^talk 23:36, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jack Awards

I noticed that you put a tag on the Jack Awards page citing that the article doesn't cite its references - however I note that there are 4 fairly specific references at the bottom of the page - which is a lot more than a whole heap of other australian music articles have. Could you provide your reasoning for the tag Dan arndt 04:11, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Removed the tag, the cleanup one still applies as each year's info needs to be in a table format to look neater --Mikecraig 04:27, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Will try and track down references for those areas with citations required. If I had the time I'd work on the table format but maybe someone with the skills might be able to assist on that one Dan arndt 04:38, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Personal Attacks

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Learn how to sign your comments --Mikecraig 00:33, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Get This Guest Hosts

Mikecraig, just curious as to why do you add 'TBA' consistantly to the List of guest hosts on Get This? It makes it difficult to view the history when there are edits with only 'TBA' added. Why not leave it off until it is announced? Stu 02:01, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

It's a standard convention and it also helps for others to contribute the names as sometimes I or others may miss hearing what Tony Martin says is the next upcoming guest co-host. --Mikecraig 23:10, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lukas Rossi Edits

Thanks for your help--my edits were woeful. I meant to come back to them this morning, but got side tracked. I am still learning.Monkeyhq 12:26, 20 March 2007 (UTC)Monkeyhq

NP :) --Mikecraig 00:44, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Flags

Hi :P , this is your choice, but the reason I do not like flags is because they can be redundant, and in some cases, space-hogging, in my opinion.. I will not mess with it though, it's your choice.. Please reply to me on my talk page if you wish.. Have a nice day! Illyria05 (Talk • Contributions) 05:05, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Please don't think I was hassling you...I thought it was just odd as there seems to be no consistancy in regards to the infoboxes for TV Shows and this flag thing is a good issue...should it go for all or stay for all?...and then set the standard for all. --Mikecraig 05:14, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Oh, I was not thinking you were hassling me, just thinking of others before myself (I tend to do that sometimes) :P .. I personally dislike flags, but again, you may choose.. Illyria05 (Talk • Contributions) 05:17, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Axlepublicityten.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Axlepublicityten.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 48 hours after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 18:49, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Bondiburger.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bondiburger.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 48 hours after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 20:35, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notability of Will & Lehmo

A tag has been placed on Will & Lehmo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Finngall ^talk 06:08, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

You can delete it as it's completly wrong anyway...new article with correct article name being written now with references and will be expanded within the next 24-48 hrs --Mikecraig 06:18, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

The new article has been similarly tagged. How can a radio show be notable enough for an encyclopedia article on its first day? --Finngall ^talk 06:22, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Because it has taken over a major timeslot and high rating program on the Triple M network and the host in question Wil Anderson is a major radio/tv personality who has had major media buildup to this new program. It has to be a stub initally until more details are given over the next few days. --Mikecraig 06:24, 2 April 2007 (UTC)