User talk:MikeWazowski
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
/Archive 1 - Feb 2006 - Dec 2006 |
Contents |
[edit] Empire
I've responded to your reply on The Empire Strikes Back's talk page. The Filmaker 00:49, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD
Hey Mike,
Sorry to have taken the lead on the webcomic AfD, but I've grown very tired of overloyal fankids trying to violate our rules/policies because they're overly interested in non-notable content. I believe your AfD was appropriate, and it appears most of the community agrees.
/Blaxthos 16:26, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:WeirdAlShow Complete.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:WeirdAlShow Complete.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 17:55, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Indiana Jones
Thanks for your contributions to the Indiana Jones page. Note that a good proportion (not all, but most) of the show was released in 1999, with George Halls sections removed. The article does not state these elements have been retconned by Lucas, or that they are no longer canon. It does however say that their canonicity is now unclear - a fair statement. Therefore the qualifying note about the 93 year old Indy stays. Regarding the fact that the elder Indy sections will be removed for the DVD release, this is in fact the case; however I can't find a direct citation for it, so I'll leave your edit in there. Mikejstevenson 04:02, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- Why are you being foolish? You appear to be interested in getting involved with edit wars - surely you can find better things to do with your time? Mikejstevenson 05:28, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- Not interesting in discussing it I see. Fair enough. Mikejstevenson 05:40, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- Not interested in paying attention to or noticing my comments and discussion on your user page and the Indiana Jones talk page? Fair enough backatcha. MikeWazowski 05:46, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- Not interesting in discussing it I see. Fair enough. Mikejstevenson 05:40, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Another Anime Convention
Mike, I'm not sure which part of this discussion you are commenting about. My statement that they have been added is referring to This Edit, in reply to Farix's request for independent, non-trivial, reliable sources stating that. That referred all the way back to my assertion that AAC is the largest anime convention in the state. Kopf1988 17:06, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Mindbridge Foundation
Mike, have you ever heard of a -prod-? Kopf1988 18:45, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AnimeIowa
Mike, the article speaks for itself. I really have to do little to prove my case, which is why I would say you were operating in bad faith. Kopf1988 05:05, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
