Talk:Mike the Headless Chicken

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mike the Headless Chicken article.
This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.
Article policies

This article was nominated for deletion on November 10 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. An archived record of this discussion can be found here.


Contents

[edit] AFD Nomination

This article has been marked for deletion as a hoax. Before anyone gets upset remember there is a process that takes place before the article gets deleted. Personally I don't thing the article needs to be deleted or should be. At the very least the festival and the story appear to exist, regardless of whether the story is true. It should be a simple matter to save the article: Just find a reliable source that claims it's a true story. If anyone can find a Guinness link that works, that'd be perfect. Failing that, if the article is reworded to state that a story exists, which may or may not be true, with a festival etc, that'd save the article too.

Best of luck. --HarrisX 02:49, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright authority - emailed to User:Brookie 6th April 2005

We checked out your website and really like it. There’s some great information and we do have a “Mike” following in the UK. We are giving you permission to copy the www.miketheheadlesschicken.org photographs on that website. I did find one thing we would like you to correct and that is the date of the annual festival. Our first festival was on May 17th which was the 3rd weekend in May, 1999. We continue to have the festival on the 3rd weekend in May, but its not always on the 17th. Let me know when you have completed the changes.

Yvonne Piquette

City of Fruita

email: yp@fruita.org

Information on the festival date corrected and Yvonne emailed to confirm Brookie 16:01, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Institution in Fruita

Mike the Headless Chicken is now an institution in Fruita, and festivals in his honor occur regularly.

What's an institution in Fruita? I'm not familiar with the phrase and/or location. --pjf 09:26, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Fruita refers to Fruita, Colorado, as is referenced in the previous paragraph. "An institution" means something that everybody knows about in a particular community. Some touchstone. RickK 09:59, Nov 20, 2004 (UTC)

[edit] "Mike, Mike - where's your head? Even without it you're not dead!"

What is this quotation? Where does this come from? Lupin 14:30, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I remember singing this in the playground - don't know where it's from though - something from the time? McGnasher 17:25, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
It is one of those things that stick in your mind for ages - goodness knows where it comes from - but seem apposite to poor old Mike - especially in its current abbreviated version! Mike Mike ....Brookie 17:37, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I have been humming that damn phrase all weekend! Mike is haunting me . Aargh.... McGnasher 10:43, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Me also - go away Mike Brookie 19:00, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Was Mike real?

Now just a second... There's no way this is real. I can't believe it! Is there any scientific explanation, or was one ever given? 24.245.29.229

I think the expanation was that a part of his brain stem was still attached, and that enabled him to still do certain things. That's how I remember reading it. Everyking 07:31, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
Yeah, part of the brain stem and also a small part of the brain. Basically, enough brain matter to maintain some semblance of life, since Mike was still able to do things like attempting to crow or preen. With the number of people not believing this article, it looks like a good article to bring up to featured article status for next year's April Fools. :-) --Deathphoenix 13:48, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
Inpossible. If the head was removed, so was the brain, since it's in the top of the head. Otherwise the brain would bungle outside and on top of the neck, along with the blood that feed the brain. In other words, this is a hoax. Nice try uncyclopedia. 213.84.109.51 16:17, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
I'll diarise it! Brookie:The grass on the hill 14:02, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
This story isn't real, is it? There is no way the chicken could have eaten without a head. So is the story an April Fool's joke? Then it should be marked as such. --Yogi de
Oh ye of little faith! This was a proper Chicken who was fed through a pipette! Smile it is not an April fool's joke! A curate's egg 21:32, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Check out a portion of an article featuring a way to "fake" a headless chicken (http://ccca.net/~bsliang/mike-a1.jpg)

[edit] THIS ARTICLE IS A DISGRACE TO THE WORD 'ENCYCLOPEDIA

Look, if the dang story is true, it's pathetic that Wikipedia junkies have let this article stand without so much as an external link to a Scientific American article or something like that on the subject. PATHETIC, PATHETIC, PATHETIC. Posted by anon user: 129.62.170.215

Thank you for your views - actually I think as a light article it is rather good - not everything is for PHd thesises! The curate's egg 06:42, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
Perhaps their's no links to the Scientific American, because they don't archive their articles back to the 1940s. -- user:zanimum


Now that's what I call trolling Johhny-turbo 21:18, 16 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Encyclopedia?

The tone is fine - it is a light hearted article that's been here a long time

So what? I thought this was supposed to be a serious encyclopedia. How does one recognize "a light hearted article"? Can I insert some "light-hearted text" in the style of

Not quite sure what to do with his by now loose head, on the first night after the decapitation Mike slept with it under his wing; it was this touching tenacity to life and the now redundant organ that convinced Olson to reprieve Mike from the cooking pot.

into George W. Bush or into Superstring theory? Oh, too serious topic? So what about Groucho Marx?

--Mormegil 11:39, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia is serious business. --205.146.140.242 16:12, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
the article seems well supported enough to me, and the tone is apropriate to the content. That seems to me the most importan judge of such concerns. 198.137.27.40 18:10, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
I put up the inappropriate tone tag, Just because the subject of the article is light hearted doesn't mean the article should be.Greatigers 23:52, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
Sorry - disagree! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 12:30, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] THIS DISGUSTING ARTICLE SHOULD BE DELETED!

This disgusting article should be deleted! This should not be an encyclopedic article. Not only is this case of this poor chicken a horrible animal rights abuse, it also damges WIKIPEDIA's image by even putting it as an encyclopedic article.

It's a weird world - there's room for all here. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 14:57, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
There's an article about Hitler, so why not the story of an unfortunate chicken? --Ravi12346 06:47, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
No! This article is intresting and informative. It should be kept. I had no idea that this was possible until I stumbled upon this article. I do not understand why it should be deleted simply because it is about a chicken that was mistreated. IMOHO spreading information about past mistakes (and sufferings) makes it possible to avoid similar mistakes again in the future. /Magnus

This wasn't animal abuse it was just a guy trying to impress his wife's mother is that wrong?


Mike..... I LOVE you you little bird-brained.... uhhhhh.... semi-bird-brained little bundle of lovin'. May you crow loud and proud up there in chicken heaven. Sniff. I love you, Mike.Obbop 17:14, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Olson or Olsen?

All of the external links say the owner's name was Olsen. Can anyone verify this? --Ravi12346 06:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Going from the official website I guess it is spelt with an "e" - I have changed the article spellings Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 07:31, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] DYI?

So umm... any leads to a source with info on how to make your own survivable headless chicken? I'm sure this thought has crossed more minds than my own. --70.251.91.6 05:34, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Cut as high up on the head as you can without crushing the skull, to try not to destroy the autonomous part of the chicken's nervous system. You may have to practice a bit, it'd be easier to practice if you own a chicken farm, of course, and different breeds of chickens may be better suited than others. I've heard it's not unusual for chickens not to die immediately upon decapitation. Tubezone 04:34, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Not immediately, no. "Running around like a chicken with its head cut off" is even an expression, but cases such as Mike must be rather rare for the bird to achieve such fame. Also: ew! --Kizor 18:53, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Moved the article

...to show that it's actually nonsense. This story got famous mostly becouse it was such a very good photo manipulation. Take a good look and you'll see that it's pre-pre-pre-photoshop from the times that they photoshopped with invisible tape, scissors and a re-photograph of the result. Pee-Tor 20:38, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Shouldn't this page be moved to a subpage of WP:BJAODN instead? -- Puckdude 01:29, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Apri1 1

This wouldn't be a bad article for the main page on April 1, 2007. It reads well and is ... funny, in the appropriate sort of way.  :) Antandrus (talk) 04:53, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../m/i/k/Talk%7EMike_the_Headless_Chicken_2056.html"