User talk:Migospia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Migospia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! timrem 02:06, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Your edit to The Noisettes

Your recent edit to The Noisettes (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 06:30, 4 January 2007 (UTC)


Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to The Noisettes. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -Painezor 02:01, 15 January 2007 (UTC)


A tag has been placed on Shingai Shoniwa, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kinu t/c 06:37, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, but I reverted back the note at the top of the article. If the article belongs at Noisettes, then let's WP:MOVE it there rather than complain about it at the top of the page. The variation of the name might even be interesting to note in the body of the article itself. But rather than say "due to a difficulty, we can't X," why not FIX X. If you want some help doing so, let us know. (John User:Jwy talk) 00:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
you: I was not complaining a the top of the page I just wanted people to get the story straight. And I do not now how to WP:MOVE it, but if someone would do it or tell me how.--Migospia 08:00, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Okay, it just comes across as a complaint. When I get some time I will read WP:MOVE more carefully and either let you know what you need to do or do it myself. If it is important to have the information about the name in the article, put something lower in the article like "while originally (or sometimes) known as "The Noisettes," they are now usually billed simply "Noisettes". - leaving off comments about wikipedia technical issues. . . (John User:Jwy talk) 13:43, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The slack republic

A tag has been placed on The slack republic, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mytildebang 03:34, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Response to...

You wrote:

Your recent edit to Todd Manning was reverted that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles." --Migospia 05:22, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

What are you talking about?! How exactly were my edits to the Todd Manning article "vandalism"? — The Real One Returns 05:27, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Removing information is vandalism--Migospia 23:29, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

HEY:

   Oh.My.God. Racist? Are you serious?! Okay, this conversation is over. — The Real One Returns 23:41, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

That is NOT explaining the removal off Evangeline on the Todd Manning page

Evangeline and Todd kissed more than once and it is known that Todd has been courting Evangeline everyone in Llanview has pointed this fact out.

I am just shocked that such hate is accepted by wikipedia, I thought wikipedia was a good source of factual information I was wrong.--Migospia 23:52, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

This is his explanation: And as far as a courtship with Evangeline goes, as of now the two aren't officially a couple...nor have they ever slept together. Her being included at this juncture is a bit premature.
You and I may not agree, but that was his reason, not racism. Come on! Al this talk about "I am just shocked that such hate is accepted by wikipedia" is just silly. I can't believe you are still beating this dead horse. TAnthony 00:24, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Accepted vandalism and hate on Wikipedia

There has been vandalism to the article Todd Manning which appears to be racism someone *protected* the page with the vandalism in place how can this be fixed?--Migospia 23:48, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

You should post a message on the talk page explaining what should be changed. It appears you feel that the wrong version is protected (follow the link to learn more about the wrong version). So, as I said, go to Talk:Todd Manning and explain what you feel should be changed. timrem 02:06, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

I have been to the Talk page have you not been there?--Migospia 02:11, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Following my post to your talk page, I looked into it more. It appears to certainly be a case of The Wrong Version, but I see no racism in the current version of the page (Note, I'm unfamiliar with the show). From what I see, though, all The Real One Returns is doing condensing the information currently in the article and removing Evangeline Williamson from the page. From the talk page discussion, it appears that he intends for Evangeline Williamson to be included in the article if more happens between the characters, but that the relationship is not yet serious enough to be called a courtship/affair. It appears you both have your own point of view on this issue, so please try to work it out civilly on the talk page while the article is protected. Also, in the future, watch how many times you revert a page so you don't violate the 3 revert rule. Discussion and consensus, not reverting and accusation, are the best way to build Wikipedia. timrem 02:27, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
You said you do not revert the the 3 rule but what if there is obvious vandalism? And if the page is protected with the vandalism in place? --Migospia 03:32, 25 March 25 2007
In this case, the edits were not obvious vandalism, but edits you perceived as vandalism. Obvious vandalism is like this: [1] [2] [3] [4], not a content dispute. timrem 03:47, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

If you look at the definition of courtship it is obvious that Todd and Evangeline relationship is and Vicki (a character on the show) even said It is clear to everyone in Llanview you are courting Evangeline so NO it is NOT an opinion. How can Marty stay when ALL that happened was a one night stand and rape but with Evangeline and Todd has been going on for years and they kissed more than once and have admitted feelings for each other as well people surrounding and in Llanview are quite aware of the courtship between them. I think it is sick that you guys are defining courtship and affair only by sex and rape.

The Real One Returns only removed it because Evangeline is of black decent, how can that not be rascim there is no other reason to remove it, I was not even the first one to put it it has been there for a while I was just undoing his vandalism to the article --Migospia 03:27, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

As I said before, I don't know anything about the show. I was just trying to calm down an obviously tense situation. I'm glad you were able to make a compromise about this issue. timrem 03:35, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Well I was calm I just do not understand why Wikipedia would allow and accept this kind of stuff to happen, so far there was no compromise, do you not understand what I am saying there was vandalism it is sitll there and no one is doing anything about it --Migospia 03:39, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Using Caps Lock usually means you are not too calm, italics and bolding are better to stress a point. If there is no compromise, what did all of you agree on on the talk page? I know that article hasn't changed yet, but no admins have been told to unlock the page. Try going to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection to get an admin's attention. timrem 03:54, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Or using caps could be to get people's attention because they kept avoioding Evangeline so I captizlied her name and no one would listen to me. I have been trying to get an admins attention to protect the page but somehow someone protcted the worng edit since all throughout the day, how can someone protect page and not a mod or admin?--Migospia 04:24, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

I'll respond point by point:
I hope I've addressed your concerns satisfactorily, as I'm going to sleep now and won't be able to respond until tomorrow. Happy editing! timrem 04:41, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:ChristianGoths.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ChristianGoths.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:25, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] External links

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added to the page Rosario Dawson do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Yamla 16:23, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

You said: "A message on my talk page of external links for Rosario Dawson was not applying with the guidelines but you did not tell me why I am confused about that?"
You added a link to a copyright violation and a link to a fansite. Both are inappropriate. The policies in question are WP:SPAM and WP:EL. Thanks! --Yamla 01:09, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
You said: "I did not link to a fan site or a copyright link, please tell me what you are talking about?"
This edit links to a youtube video and to Rosario Dawson Online, both in violation of WP:EL or WP:SPAM. --Yamla 01:22, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Don'tGiveUp.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Don'tGiveUp.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:07, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Sourced--Migospia 11:26, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Medium -- 3x16.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Medium -- 3x16.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:08, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

I thought I sourced it, will do now--Migospia 03:47, 7 April 2007 (UTC) Um it is sourced?--Migospia 03:49, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../m/i/g/User_talk%7EMigospia_6b34.html"