User talk:Midnightguinea

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Chochapelle.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Chochapelle.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:05, 28 November 2006 (UTC)


A tag has been placed on Indigo (actress), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. —Pilotguy (ptt) 03:20, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hello, and Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Midnightguinea, and welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

In addition, you are encouraged (but not required) to cite your sources. Wikipedia:Citation templates has some useful fill-in-the-blank type things that may make that easier, but feel free not to use them if you find them confusing.

You may want to look at some of Wikipedia's best work to get an idea of what we are aiming at.

You are invited to use your userpage to tell us a little about yourself; yours is here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page (which is your talk page) and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. You also might be interested in being adopted by Wikipedia's Adopt-a-user program. Again, welcome!

  ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 16:28, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

P.S. I left a little note for you on Talk:Indigo (actress) ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving

[edit] Pan's Labyrinth

You might find this helpful. It seems to detail a bit of violence. I'm going to see it tonight myself in a couple of hours. —Erik (talkcontribreview) - 23:01, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. As I suspected, there is no way in heck I will be able to see this film. Sad, as it seems brilliant. Midnightguinea 23:35, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Easter Bradford/James Bradford/User:Orthogonal/non-famous_person

Thanks for your reply; not being familiar with the subject, I had no idea we already had an article at James Bradford for this individual (if that's indeed true; it's hard to tell since the userspace draft contains no references). However since it DOES contain no references and it probably is superceded by the main article, I've put it up on Miscellanea for discussion where it should be a slamdunk assuming neither of us is missing anything. In the meantime, I'll blank that section on the controversy, since the rest of the article is relatively neutral. Does that make sense/seem acceptable? -- nae'blis 16:21, 6 April 2007 (UTC)