Talk:Middlemarch

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the General Project Discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Article Grading:
The following comments were left by the quality and importance raters: (edit)


Classed "B" as this is quite a full article, but for such a work it is in serious need of more material on notability, a ==Literary significance & criticism==, ==Major themes== & ==Allusions/references from other works== sections should all be possible. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 08:05, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Mary Garth

I changed the line about Mary Garth's "publishing a volume of poetry" because the novel gives no indication that it is a book of poetry: "But when Mary wroet a little book for her boys, called Stories of Great Men, taken from Plutarch, and had it printed and published ..." (fifth paragraph of the Finale). My new version just says "published an historical volume for boys" and I encourage anyone else to improve upon the phrasing, but I think it's more accurate now.

[edit] Morrisey trivia

I added this. (God, I'm literate! :-)) SmokeyTheCat 14:43, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Criticism of Dorothea

Citing some article second-rate journal seems like poor excuse to me for making the 'criticism' section notable. Judging by its lack of other citations its either a direct summary of the article, which doesn't seem encyclopedic, its using unsourced statements, or original claims. Without any arguement for in the next week I'll cut the section since it's unecyclopedic no matter how you slice it. Wilhelm Ritter 04:13, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Time Top Ten

Hmm. It seems that someone has added a reference to every book on the top ten list at http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1578073,00.html as being "named by Time as one of the top ten books of all time." This statement isn't really accurate; the online Time article is actually about a recent book (The Top Ten) which is just a compilation of various contemporary authors' personal top ten lists. To say that Time named any of these books as the "ten greatest of all time" is basically just incorrect.