Middle ground

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The middle ground logical fallacy (also called argumentum ad temperantiam) asserts that a compromise between two positions is correct. The middle ground is often invoked when there are sharply contrasting views that are deeply entrenched. While an outcome that accommodates both parties to some extent is more desirable than an outcome that pleases nobody, it is not necessarily correct.

[edit] Examples

  • The concept of neutrality during wars, or the various third way economic movements can sometimes be considered an argument for taking the middle ground.
  • "Opinions on abortion range from banning it altogether to allowing it on demand; thus the correct view is restricted abortions."

(This form can only be classified as a fallacy when it makes a claim to prove the truth of a proposition. A utilitarian or pragmatic policy of neutrality in war, "third way" economics, or a "moderate" abortion policy may be advanced as expedients to avoid certain undesirable effects, without committing any fallacy.)

  • The potential outcome of King Solomon's decree (in the Old Testament) — when confronted with two women who each claimed the same baby to be their own — that the baby be cut in half and each purported mother given half. This was of course a plan to determine the true mother, but had it actually come down to cutting the baby in half, it would have been done on the false pretense that half for one, half for the other — that is to say, the middle ground — would have been a reasonable decision for the parties involved.

In this example, it can be argued that a neutral point of view does not actually mean treating all competing theories as equally valid.

  • "Some would say that arsenic is a delicious and necessary part of the human diet, but others claim it is a toxic and dangerous substance. The truth is somewhere in between..."



Absurdity | Argument from ignorance | Argument from silence | Bandwagon fallacy
Bulverism | Irrelevant conclusion | Middle ground | Missing argument
Proof by assertion | Straw man | Style over substance | Two wrongs make a right
Appeal to consequences:
Appeal to force | Wishful thinking
Appeal to emotion:
Fear | Flattery | Nature | Pity | Repugnance | Ridicule | Spite
Genetic fallacy:
Personal attack (Appeal to motive | Guilt by association | Poisoning the well | You too)
Appeal to authority (Novelty | Poverty | Tradition | Wealth) | Chronological snobbery | Etymology
Other types of fallacy
In other languages