User talk:Michael Greiner
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, Michael Greiner, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
Welcome back to wikipedia.
Again, welcome! --Paul E. Ester 14:32, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Dingman
Dingman's Ferry is still a toll crossing. - UtherSRG (talk) 00:43, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Southwest Vacations
Okay, I've been watching the revert fest on the Southwest Vacations link on the Southwest article. I'm curious what is your rationale for removing it? It is part of Southwest is it not? βCliffb 00:54, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
- Fair enough -- perhaps in future removals that could be cited -- I doubt the links are being added out of malice, just a lack of understanding why it isn't there.. βCliffb 02:27, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 04:49, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Boston, Ontario
Boston, Ontario is not a hoax. It is listed as an unincorporated area in the Atlas of Canada http://atlas.nrcan.gc.ca -- TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 16:59, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] njsr succession boxes
The njsr succession boxes are not needed for any New Jersey state routes with an infobox, as the data is already at the bottom of the infoboxes. Alansohn 04:25, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] dendrofiliac
i just wrote the article, rechceck it it does link now dude.
and p.s. whats the abseball projecta ll about, im kind of a huge A's fan, [see!] Qrc2006 01:19, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thanks man, yeah it didnt exist yet cuz i was like working on it and stuff hahha and i didnt want to submit it basicly to avoid a speedy and even a afd before it was off the ground n shit
[edit] vote for me
im nominated for system operator (sysop) or admin vote for me please! here
[edit] New baseball article improvement drive
[edit] WP:CSD
Please note that lack of notability isn't a CSD for businesses. You've gotta use prod and afd instead. Regards, alphaChimp(talk) 04:07, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] If you don't know the theme from Zorba
Verify it first. Then go to a Yankee game or listen on the radio. You will hear it every game. Chivista 19:42, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Robot curfman
I was just taking a look at this article, and was trying to figure out if there was a speedy category that would be appropriate. I see nothing in the article that is salvagable, and it does not even qualify as a webcomic, since he says the website is not up yet. No notability, and not a well-written article. It's a pity that some people can't tell the difference between Wikipedia and MySpace. ---Charles 05:02, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
- I didn't see any speedy category either and that's why I prodded it. If it gets deprodded, I will take it to Afd. Michael Greiner 05:07, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, I thought about db-nonsense, but I really think that one gets used in places where it is not truly appropriate, so I erred on the side of caution. A prod works, and I have a feeling, nothing will be done with the article until the time comes that it is deleted. Just a hunch. ---Charles 18:20, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] re: James Jackson Jarves
If you check the contribs of the article creator, he/she builds articles about past people/authors/books. The article's name is listed as being part of a book in another article this person worked on. I was going to tag it csd bio but just left it on my watchlist. That's when I saw your tag. Ronbo76 01:02, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] GSP shield
Please see our fair use criteria, specifically number 8: "The material must contribute significantly to the article (e.g. identify the subject of an article, or specifically illustrate relevant points or sections within the text) and must not serve a purely decorative purpose." The use of the GSP shield in the infobox does not do this. --NE2 22:31, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Up from Jericho Tel
I deleted the prod because I found some more info on the book including that it won at least two awards. The author, mentioned by the article's writer in the talk page but not in the article itself, has also written several books. So, it seems notable to me and not some random page. Look at my changes and if you still think it should be deleted, please put it up for discussion. Cathy βThe preceding unsigned comment was added by 172.166.117.206 (talk) 14:37, 13 February 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Southwest Airlines Flight 1763
Hey Michael - the reason I deleted "In their own defense" in the Southwest Airlines article is because of the NPOV policy of letting the facts speak for themselves. I think "In their own defense" is actually redundant and slightly editorializing in this context. Cheers --Matt 20:58, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Plus, I think the sentence is tighter without it. --Matt 21:01, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- The sentence wasn't the best I agree, but the three cites support that the death was caused by actions of the passengers in self defense and that is not clearly explained by the sentence. Reading the article, it could be inferred that he died from injuries occurring when breaking down the cockpit door, not from other passengers. Michael Greiner 21:36, 30 March 2007 (UTC)