User talk:MichaelJanich
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Image:Dsc04137.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Dsc04137.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 15:29, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Dsc04394.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Dsc04394.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 15:32, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Moved images to commons
Hi, the who images listed above have been moved to Commons and is available as Image:India Gate.jpg and Image:Queen Victoria memorial, Kolkata.jpg so I'm deleting the "local" versions of them (we can use files from commons directly here). I would also suggest that you move the rest of your photos there too (with more descriptive filenames), that way all the Wikimedia projects can benefit from them and they don't risk deletion if they are not used in any articles because while Wikipedia is not a image repository Commons is exactly that ;-) --Sherool (talk) 16:10, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Zudeo.com
A tag has been placed on Zudeo.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
Please see Wikipedia:Notability (web). -- Fan-1967 02:37, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Many websites claim to be significant because of new technology, or new marketing methods, or because they are about a significant subject. None of these factors are relevant to the standards set at Wikipedia:Notability (web). I recommend you read those standards.
- The simple fact is that, since grokster, there have been untold thousands of startups of file-sharing websites. The measure of their notability is in their staying power, and the attention they receive from the market and the public. This site has yet to demonstrate either. Fan-1967 04:47, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- Again, the newness of the concept is irrelevant. What the new article has, not in the previous version, is indication of serious attention from the press. You didn't actually bother to read the Notability definition above, did you? Fan-1967 06:44, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
