Talk:Michel Drucker

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	France Portal Michel Drucker is within the scope of WikiProject France, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to France and Monaco on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

THREE people editing my shitty little article a few minutes after it has been created... you really have no life! :-) (and some way of knowing when an article has been created).

Easy. Many people on Wikipedia have a look sometimes on Recent Changes just to check if some people wrote something interesting on something they're interested in... or if people are vandalizing pages. David.Monniaux 22:50, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Great! BTW, please do not replace correct and in this case first-hand information, even if badly formulated, with incorrect and watered-down reformulations. Michel has been voted the most popular host at least a few times, including the time when I read the results. And the anecdote thing is wrong in the new form by David. This is not "a joke" by Michel. Again, I watched the show where he told the story.

The problem is that your first-hand information was a bit outlandish and said in a jokingly manner. People will tend to water down information that is not attributed nor properly qualified, and seems to express some exaggeration or personal bias. David.Monniaux 06:36, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)