Talk:Michael Poe

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Comics This article is in the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! Edit the article attached to this page or discuss it at the project talk page. Help with current tasks, or visit the notice board.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. Please explain the rating here.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's importance scale.
This article has been automatically rated as Stub-Class by the Comics WikiProject because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove auto=yes from the {{Comicsproj}} template above.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class= parameter in the {{Comicsproj}} template above and removing the stub template from the article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]
Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 2007 March 27. The result of the discussion was no consensus.
WWW

This article is part of WikiProject Webcomics, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to webcomics on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article Michael Poe, or visit the project page for more details on the projects.

Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale.

[edit] Proposed merge of Exploitation Now

Since nobody has started the discussion on this matter, allow me. I think it's a bad, bad idea. A really horrible one, actually. What I think is more welcome is simply expanding the Exploitation Now article so it is less stubby. Since it is a work of fiction it should be fairly trivial to do, what with the comic itself being a reliable source. -- Y|yukichigai (ramble argue check) 19:40, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Let me explain why I added it. I strongly doubt that EN meets any of the WP:WEB guidelines. Much more notable comics have fallen at AfD; I wonder if even Errant Story is properly notable. I know I haven't seen any independent notable coverage of EN, but I'm not so sure about ES. --Gwern (contribs) 22:16 9 February 2007 (GMT)

I agree with Yukichigai. This is a really bad idea. I am currently updating the page with much, much, much more information. Swtrooper 14:21, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Iknow that I've never edited this article before, but I have to say that the comic in question is notible enough, it does meets criteria #3 of WP:WEB, what with being distributed by keenspot and all. (Justyn 20:59, 15 March 2007 (UTC))

Oppose: Exploitation now has won 2 WCCAs, it is independantly hosted and has been published. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 19:14, 27 March 2007 (UTC)