Talk:Michael Kenneth Pratt
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Most recent?
Philip, can you clarify
- He is a recipient of the George Cross, and of all living recipients, his award is the most recent such to a civilian. The most recent award, and the most recent award to a living recipient, was to Trooper Christopher Finney in 2003.
- Who is the most recent recipient?
- Who is the most recent civilian recipient?
- Among those recipients who are civilians, who received the award last?
- Among those recipients who are still alive, who received the award last?
Also, can you perhaps supply when Pratt received the award? Thanks! -- Perfecto
- (1) Christopher Finney; (2) Stewart Graeme Guthrie; (3) Guthrie (isn't this the same question?); (4) Finney. Pratt's award was gazetted on 4 July 1978. -- Necrothesp 11:19, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
Then the sentence really should only read
- He is a recipient of the George Cross in 4 July 1978.
-- Perfecto 20:26, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
-
- No, it was perfectly accurate (although poorly worded). Guthrie's award was posthumous and Finney was (and is) not a civilian. -- Necrothesp 13:20, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
- Are constables civilians (in Australia)? FYI, sentences cannot be accurate and poorly worded at the same time. :) -- Perfecto 18:59, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
- Civilian, as in non-military. Are Australian police officers military police? No. Therefore, they are civilians. Yes, a sentence can be accurate (i.e. factually correct) and badly worded at the same time. -- Necrothesp 20:13, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
--PhilipIsPDR 16:48, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
-
- I'm coming a little late to this (apologies) - but for what it's worth, hmph, I thought the sentence was clear enough. ;) Nonetheless, (not that it matters) I entirely approve of the alteration and the sentence as it stands now.