Talk:Michael Baldasaro
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Split
These two guys should certainly not be in the same article. Stifle (talk) 16:44, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
- Agreed. CJCurrie 21:17, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
- Yes and no, the true Canadian answer. 8^)
-
- My own opinion, as the original author and former resident of Hamilton where they are best known, is that they are fringe people worth little more than a stub collectively. Either man individually would not warrant an article, or if they got their own articles they would be criticised as a stub. Because they work in tandem, religiously and politically, you would effectively have to clone this article for no good purpose.
-
- However, if somebody feels like interviewing Brothers Wally and Michael, or poring over court documents to get more in-depth biographical details of arrests, charges and trials, and in the process really boosting the content, then yes, split.
Anderskin 22:47, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Merge
OTOH, I'd have no problems merging it with the Church of the Universe. There is a role for the fringe, but by definition it is small. IIRC, I had planned to put the few biographical details there, but Baldassaro was already redlinked so I just wrote him a short little article.
Anderskin 22:54, 8 June 2006 (UTC)