User talk:Metazargo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi. I'm always prepared to discuss my deletions, but I can't be specific without the title of the article you are concerned about.

In general terms, an article must list verifiable sources, be neutral (NPOV) (not a advertisement or biased viewpoint), be notable enough for a global encyclopaedia (many bands, bios and websites fail on that score) and be written as an encyclopaedia article (not a blog etc).

The time interval isn't relevant - once you've saved your work, it can be edited or deleted on sight. If that's a problem, write it in Word or Works, and then copy the text into Wikipedia.

If I really don't understand the topic, and the above criteria are not obviously missed, I leave the article.

I didn't understand the comment about signatures.

I can make mistakes, of course, but without an article title, I can't review my deletion or give further clarification, jimfbleak 19:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Ah, I think you mean Obtree, which you've recreated. I'll leave it for now, but I'll look again soon, since it still reads like an advert. jimfbleak 19:52, 4 December 2006 (UTC)