User talk:METALGOD42088

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] STATUS

I AM BETTER THAN ALL OF YOU! METALGOD42088 01:25, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] METALGOD42088

I invite you to my growing metal forum listed below: METALGOD42088

Thank You I hope you enjoy it and you are an active member METALGOD42088 00:38, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] metal forum

Sorry, but Wikipedia is not for advertising, so please don't post links to your metal forum. happy editting --Eel 02:49, 11 January 2006 (UTC)


"Articles about companies and products are fine if they are written in an objective and unbiased style."

I DON'T THINK I WAS BIAS WHEN "ADVERTISING" MY FORUM. IT IS A METAL FORUM AND IT IS NOT LIKE I POSTED ON TOP OR DELETED ALL OTHER LINKS. SO PLEASE STOP DELETING MY LINK. THANK YOU.METALGOD42088 02:55, 11 January 2006 (UTC)


Well, I suppose, but wikipedia isn't for self-promotion, either, and surely you'll agree that posting a link to your own site is self-promotion. Also, it's pretty debatable about your site being notable. I don't mean any offense, but we don't want to crowd up pages with a bunch of non-notable links. --Eel 03:01, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add commercial links — or links to your own private websites — to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- Parasti 03:08, 11 January 2006 (UTC)


  • That is for like if I link my autobiography about my life, but I see your point. However, I need use "A Growing Metal Forum" as a comment which is true. My site can be notable one day. But even not it can still be of use to someone. And I think of it as not MY site BUT a site open to all METALHEADS. METALGOD42088 03:10, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
It doesn't matter what you think of your website, or if it's your site, or what people it is meant for. It does not contain any relevant and useful info for any article you have added the links to, and from a certain point of view you are merely promoting a community website to have more people use it or more search engines index it. So, yeah, that is called spam and eventually people get blocked for it. -- Parasti 03:32, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Don't worry, if and when your site becomes notable, it'll be added, but there's no need to add it now. As parasti pointed out, Wikipedia is not for links to your own site. Thanks. --Eel 03:16, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add commercial links — or links to your own private websites — to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Jkelly 03:39, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] What should not be linked to

  1. Links that are added to promote a site, by the site operator or its affiliates. See

External link spamming.

(Opes 03:41, 11 January 2006 (UTC))


Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. Jkelly 04:19, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Now you're just taking the...

OK, so you spotted that I removed your link from several other pages where it didn't belong. It also doesn't belong on my talk page. The fact I removed it tells you I must have looked at it already. Therefore why bother shoving it somewhere else where I'll just remove it?

I know you probably don't realise this, but you are causing a problem and you are annoying people. Look at the comments on your page here. Do you see any positive ones? If you want to advertise your forum, go do it on a chat site or get enough legal links for it to crop up on Google. Don't put it here.

IainP (talk) 00:31, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] DEATH SQUADS

RULE! METALGOD42088 00:33, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Nigger, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 01:02, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

Also please don't remove comments left on your talk page by others. Please see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thanks -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 01:06, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. "Do not make personal attacks anywhere in Wikipedia. Comment on content, not on the contributor. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users." Please keep this is mind while editing. Thanks, -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 01:18, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WAR?

  • WHO WANTS A *BLEEP* (F-WORD)ING WAR? METALGOD42088 01:25, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked for spamming and disruptive editing. After your lock, please contribute by adding only encyclopedic content to Wikipedia. Jkelly 01:27, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Talk pages

Please don't remove comments left on your talk page by others. It is generally considered rude at best. Please see Wikipedia:Talk_page#Etiquette. --Qirex 02:37, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Civility

I cannot possibly fathom what you are trying to achieve by listing users you consider "faggots" on your page, but I removed it, again. Please understand that Wikipedia is a community, and there are common sense rules about civility. --Qirex 01:15, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] John Cena

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. --Alhutch 05:09, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

Warning: Please do not add obscenities to Wikipedia. Injecting unnecessary swear words, racially or sexually abusive comments, or provocative pictures to articles or user pages offends many people. Wikipedia treats such actions as vandalism and blocks people from editing for such repeated vandalism. --NaconKantari 05:17, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

if you vandalize another article, I will personally block you. Please stop. You have been warned.--Alhutch 05:19, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] VANDALISM

what does vandalism mean? METALGOD42088 05:21, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia:Vandalism --NaconKantari 05:22, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
it means edits like this one [1].--Alhutch 05:23, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

I have another question. If I call you a jew considered vandalism?

No, that would fall under WP:NPA --NaconKantari 05:26, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

I have another question if I just say the word MOTHERFUCKER! is that considered vandalism?

nope.--Alhutch 05:35, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

What about if you stick your dick in a horse's ass? Is that considered vandalism? METALGOD42088 05:37, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. "Do not make personal attacks anywhere in Wikipedia. Comment on content, not on the contributor. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users." Please keep this is mind while editing. Thanks, --NaconKantari 05:37, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Personal Attacks

Are the following statements personal attacks or the truth?:

METALGOD42088 05:42, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] MOTHERFUCKER

This is not considered vandalism:

"I have another question if I just say the word MOTHERFUCKER! is that considered vandalism?

nope.--Alhutch 05:35, 16 January 2006 (UTC)"
as long as you don't vandalize articles, i couldn't care less what you do.--Alhutch 05:50, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

If I state that if this user Alhutch is a male that Alhutch must have a penis. Or if Alhutch is a female then Alhutch has no dick considered a personal attack?

[edit] Blocked

I have blocked you from editing for 15 minutes for being a general nuisance.--Alhutch 06:14, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked again

After being blocked for 15 minutes, you came back and made this edit: [2]. Your block is now nine hours. Please consider not vandalizing articles in the future.--Alhutch 08:02, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Again

This is getting ridiculous. So I blocked you for nine hours for this edit: [3]. Then you came back and made this edit: [4]. If you're betting on me getting tired of watching you and blocking you when you keep vandalizing the John Cena article, you're wrong. Your block is now 24 hours.--Alhutch 03:20, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Time to think

I'm going to give you some time to think about stuff. You are now blocked for four days for vandalizing the Owen Hart article.--Alhutch 23:28, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] numbers

could you maybe not put all those numbers on your user page. It takes about 5 minutes to load.--Alhutch 20:23, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

METALGOD42088 - this is getting ridiculous. Do you have any idea how much of an abuse of resources that is? I think you need to find a new outlet, or growup. (Opes 22:41, 1 February 2006 (UTC))

LOL I'm the bee knees METALGOD42088 22:47, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text, deliberate misinformation, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you believe you have been blocked unfairly, please add the text {{unblock}} to this page, along with an explanation of why you believe you were unfairly blocked. An administrator will review your case. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. RexNL 23:03, 1 February 2006 (UTC)