Talk:Message-oriented middleware
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] MOM asynchronous?
"that relies on asynchronous message"
IMO MOM is not always asynchronous. -- annon - 11:57, 12 April 2006
- I think that is dealt with in the Disadvantages section where most MOM systems have facilities to group a request and a response as a single pseudo-synchronous transaction. - annon 10:29, 9 October 2006
MOM by nature and definition is asynchronous. It can seem confusing because async communication can happen in real time. Also, to muddy the water further, some implementations use a MOM solution to furnish part of a sync request, which can lead one to beleive that MOM is part of a synch request.
[edit] Spelling 'queuing'
There seems to be disagreement over the spelling for queuing. can we please leave it WITHOUT the "e", which is the traditional spelling? -- Rbpasker 20:01, 15 July 2006
[edit] MOM Products
removed section per Wikipedia is not a directory. Wikipedia is not a repository for lists, directories or Advocacy of commercial products and/or websites. NPOV requires views to be represented without bias, this applies not only to article text, but to companies, company lists, products, external links, or any other material as well.--Hu12 18:19, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Other standards that are worth mentioning
- (AMS) Asynchronous Messaging Service - a CCSDS standard under review for the message service and related protocols
- (GMSEC) Goddard Mission Services Evolution Center - has a published standard API for publish-subscribe middleware with an open-source reference implementation.
- WS-Eventing and WS-Notification
- (DDS) Data Distribution Service
- CORBA Event Service
Brian Gregory 05:03, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sponsored Links?
Is the "sponsored" link at the bottom of the page for the "Enterprise Integration Patterns" book legal? Can I post links to my materials too? (I'm still learning wikipedia rules and etiquette - please don't kill the Newbie) Brian Gregory 05:08, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Brian, I agree. On 23 Nov 2006, user 65.87.179.138 added a link to a book advertisement (Enterprise Integration Patterns) to 4 different pages. Granted, those pages were at least tangentially related to the articles in question, but the site contained little information besides teasers. If we include links to all books that are somewhat related to the subject, the lists will be long and useless. It makes sense to include references to books if those books are primarily targeted to the subject. Fordsfords 23:06, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
