Talk:Mesh Computers
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of Business and Economics WikiProject. | |
| Stub | rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale. | |
[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mesh Computers
This article was nominated for deletion on 29 January 2006, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mesh Computers. The original listing gathered no consensus, and was relisted for further discussion. Due to some confusion in the relisting, the discussion was closed shortly after the relisting (at which point, 6 new comments had been added the initial nomination and sole comment prior to relisting, and consensus was developing to delete). During a Wikipedia:Deletion review, new evidence came to light addressing the reasons for deletion; the article was then undeleted. It was not relisted on AfD as consensus at DRV was that it would survive easily per the new information. -- Jonel | Speak 22:28, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - It is unclear that a consensus to delete was developing after the relisting; merely that at the time of closure a consensus to delete was there. Also, the article was undeleted as being out of process, not due to new evidence. Steve block talk 22:44, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - By "consensus was developing", I did not mean to imply that such a trend was irreversible by further commentary (terminology issue there, I think we're trying to say the same thing). And User:Steve block is quite correct in that the undeletion was due to the error in process, though it was the new evidence that kept the article from being relisted. I apologize for the lack of clarity. -- Jonel | Speak 01:43, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- The DRV discussion contains the new evidence. It should probably be incorporated into the article. --- Charles Stewart(talk) 16:35, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - This article reads like an advert for the company, especially the Award Winning PCs bit. I don't come here often enough, nor know enough about the company, to be able to offer any improvements, but felt it needed flagging up. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Oolon Colluphid (talk • contribs) 14:24, 12 March 2007 (UTC).
