From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
|
Start |
This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. |
|
This article has an archived CVG peer review that may contain ideas for improvement. |
CVG To-do:
- Expand: New CVG Articles, Normality, Pac-Man World 2, Operation Flashpoint: Elite, Call of Juarez, Galactic Civilizations II: Dark Avatar, Ford Street Racing, Betrayal at Krondor
- CVG Peer Review: List of F-Zero titles, Kya: Dark Lineage, Wii Remote, Dynasty Warriors 4, The Sims 2, The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past, Kirby's Dream Land, Electronic sports, Fire Emblem, Dante (Devil May Cry), The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion, Final Fantasy XII, Sonic the Hedgehog (16-bit), Classes in World of Warcraft
- Cleanup: Age of Mythology, Mario Kart: Double Dash!!, Betrayal at Krondor, List of Nintendo trademarks
- Merge:
- Deletions / Essential articles / Magazines
- Assess and Prioritise articles (Log)
|
[edit] Mini review
A quick reply to the request at WP:CVG: my main comment would be about the balance of the article. At the moment, the Gameplay section far outweighs the Critical response section, which isn't really the way an encyclopedia article should me. What I want to know about is "why is this game significant" and "what effects did it have", not "which weapons work against which enemies", which is material for the game's manual and/or GameFAQs. Cheers --Pak21 15:25, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Surely the gameplay section always outweighs the critical response section? But then again, I understand your concern. The critical response section does seem far too small and I will work on it. Wolf ODonnell 15:49, 23 January 2007 (UTC)