Wikipedia talk:Mediation committee

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You know there is already a page Wikipedia:Mediation Committee that was created as part of Wikipedia:Mediation and Arbitration (proposal). Since Mediation Committee is an official name of an official Wikipedia activity should not it be capitalized? — Alex756 16:10, 8 Dec 2003 (UTC)

BTW. I have written some stuff on meta, as a possible framework for mediation. I confess I wasn't thinking primarily about the English wikipedia while doing it, but trying to find stuff that should work on foreign language wiki's as well, where Jimbo Wales can not perhaps have as direct an oversight as on the English wikipedia. That said, as I have been tinkering with it, I am beginning to gather courage that it might not turn out to be totally useless for the English wikipedia either. The files I have drafted so far are m:Mediation, and m:Mediation oversight procedure. They probably need to be prettyfied quite substantially, and maybe voted on, after everybody else on the committee has had a tinker in them as well. Please note, that I personally don't think we should go beyond the framework, into micromanageing the mediation process. Each mediation should be formed by the issues at hand and the people participating. -- Cimon Avaro on a pogostick 16:13, Dec 8, 2003 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Mediation committee now redirects to Wikipedia:Mediation Committee. (Cimon, I've copied your text above to the talk page there too) -- sannse 17:26, 8 Dec 2003 (UTC)