Wikipedia:Mediation Committee/Nominations/WikiMan53

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] WikiMan53

WikiMan53 (talk • contribs) Your statement on why you want to be on the Mediation Committee: Ok, I accept. I am a loyal wikipedian with many edits substantially in the first month. I wish as many as you know to help people. I believe this is they way I can fill my duty and my wish. As you know, I've had no bad edits, no blocks or anything. Please vote wisely. I will help you!WikiMan53 T/C e@ edits 01:59, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Mediation committee:

• Oppose, sorry. Just need some more experience. ^demon^{[omg plz]} 17:02, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose at this time - Mediators need to be familiar with WP's conventions and rules. -Ste|vertigo 00:49, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Outside opinions:

• With all due respect, I believe you don't have enough experience on Wikipedia, as well as a lack of experience in dispute resolution. I would strongly urge you join the Mediation Cabal and gain a fair bit of experience in mediating disputes before nominating yourself for the Mediation Committee (the MedCab is not an elected position, as opposed to the MedCom). Sorry, but I urge you withdraw this request, as you only have been editing Wikipedia for less than a month, which creates an obvious lack of experience with how Wikipedia works[1], and have less than 600 edits, as well as no experience in dispute resolution. Daniel.Bryant ^{[ T · C ]} 02:18, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
  • I don't think he has enough experience for Mediation Cabal either. Before doing any dispute resolution, a person needs to actually contribute content to articles and encounter content disputes. With the exception of replacing an article with a copyright-infringing unwikified poor essay [2], this user has made no non-minor edits[3] and has not been involved in any discussion of article content whatsoever[4]. —Centrx→talk • 09:12, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Comments:

Rejected per 2 oppose rule ^demon^{[omg plz]} 03:34, 13 January 2007 (UTC)