Wikipedia:Mediation Committee/Nominations/RogueNinja

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] User:RogueNinja

RogueNinja (talk contribs) I would like to become more active in non-editing duties in Wikipedia. I have concentrated my edits mostly on Martial Arts, along with some science and medicine articles. I recently (this morning) asked for a mediation, which is how I discovered that this is not a sub-committee of ArbCom. I understand completely if you would like me to have more edits on more articles, but I feel that I have enough wiki experience to help mediate disputes. RogueNinja 02:42, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Mediation committee:

  • Abstain, as I am currently mediating a dispute which involves you as a representative of this Committee and it would be inproper for me to vote either way. However, although you seem like an able candidate in the future, the Mediation Committee is the final level of Mediation (voluntary resolution, prior to forced arbitration), and I suspect most MC members will oppose you because you have not had any experience in helping out with solving disputes at a "lower" level (eg. WP:MEDCAB, WP:AMA, WP:3O). The MedCom tends to deal with the disputes that aren't suited to these places, primarily because they deal with more difficult issues. Can I make a friendly suggestion that you withdraw this, help out with the MedCab (in particular - it's where most of the MC members come from), and then if you are still interested in dealing with the high-level disputes after you've "wet your feet" in the slightly-easier ones, reapply here? Oh, by the way, although I dissent the notion, some of the Mediation Committee members would also prefer members to have been elected an administrator through community consensus; because you aren't (which is fine, in my opinion), the prior experience is probably more vital. Cheers, and I hope my guidance is helpful (as well as my mediating at Karate! :D), Daniel Bryant 08:09, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
    PS: The MedCom isn't a subcommittee of ArbCom, by the way; although it is the next level down the dispute resolution chain, we have no formal ties to them whatsoever. Just a handy note :) Daniel Bryant 08:10, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Outside opinions:

Comments: