Wikipedia:Mediation Committee/Nominations/MegamanZero
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] MegamanZero
Wikipedia is the place to be when evaluating thesis, making conjecture, and writing great articles to be informative. Along with the need to construct overlying amounts of info on our articles, we need many editors. Of course, with many editors, and many different views, opinions, and people seeing what they can think is right, sometimes these can lead to arguments, and henceforth can lead to WP:EW, something which I hope very much to avoid. Regarding my experience I regard Civilty as very important, and I always keep my cool when dealig in disagreements with others users. I have had many differences in opinions since I have arrived at wikipedia, but I have always kept a open mind, listening to other's opinions, respecting them, and will never undermine anyone else's viewpoints. I always try to be understanding, I believe, when disagreements pop up, and will readily admit when I am wrong. Seeing some recent situations arise has finally given me initiative to apply for nomination, and I will do the best and more to help mediate on wikipedia. I am fairly involved as far as wikipedia policy goes as well, and will use my common sense to the best of my abilitiy. My goal is be more helpful and constructive to wikipedia as a whole. If doubtful of my ability please throw in constructive critisisim so that I may learn, and perhaps gain your trust next time. -MegamanZero|Talk 15:41, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
MC opinions:
Oppose per User Page attack on Kelly Martin. A mediator is expected to keep a cool head always. Ral315 (talk) 13:12, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
-
- There seems to be a misunderstanding. Several issues on wikipedia have convinced me to consider starting a project agaist incivilty; and I simply used her situation as a example. I even explained to her that it was not directed at her, and she replied she took no offense. Taking thesis and concensus form the community, It was clear that she was somewhat incivil and I only wished to state a point. However, it is your perception that it violates WP:NPA, so I will honor your thoughts and remove it. I, by no means meant a personal attack. -MegamanZero|Talk 15:30, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Neutral still; will continue to think about the nomination. Ral315 (talk) 13:06, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
- Question: What is the deal with the "Odd edits on wikipedia" section on your userpage? Are you planning on using these against people? — Asbestos | Talk (RFC) 15:39, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
-
- Oh no. :) Its just a miraid of edits that I find quite humorous and well, odd. They aren't ammunition, no. :) -MegamanZero|Talk 15:39, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. I haven't seen anything wrong. — Asbestos | Talk (RFC) 16:00, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose - I would like to see a bit more time, experience, and adminship first. Again, nothing personal, but I don't think now is the time. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 22:56, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
Community opinions:
