Wikipedia:Mediation Committee/Nominations/Blankfaze
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Blankfaze
I've been meaning to get more involved in community issues anyhow (hence why I was running for ArbCom). Well, four MC members were just elected to the Arbitration Committee, so I imagine the MC will probably need a few people with time on their hands and who are willing, which I am. If any of you don't know me, I've been here for eight months, admin for five, see my user page or contributions for more information. I would hope to be as superb a mediator as sannse and ambi have, butthat is truly a lofty goal. Anyhow, I'm willing to take a shot at it. BLANKFAZE | (что??) 19:00, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Mediation committee:
I'll probably support anyway, but have you got any examples of where you've been involved in conflict resolution? It'd be nice to see how you might mediate before making a final verdict.Good enough explanation for me, so support. Ambi 01:07, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)- Admittedly I don't have a whole lot of experience mediating disputes, probably because I try not to get involved in too many of them. However, I do believe myself to be steadfastly able to be neutral and consider all POVs and not let personal opinions influence my editing (for example, I've reverted leftist-stipulation additions to George W. Bush and many other articles even though I oftentimes agreed with them). I think any of the Wikipedians who know me very well would vouch for my neutrality and fairmindedness. BLANKFAZE | (что??) 09:04, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- For the curious, I'd just like to add that I also have an intimate and thorough knowledge of Wikipedia policy, including the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution process. BLANKFAZE | (что??) 09:16, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Admittedly I don't have a whole lot of experience mediating disputes, probably because I try not to get involved in too many of them. However, I do believe myself to be steadfastly able to be neutral and consider all POVs and not let personal opinions influence my editing (for example, I've reverted leftist-stipulation additions to George W. Bush and many other articles even though I oftentimes agreed with them). I think any of the Wikipedians who know me very well would vouch for my neutrality and fairmindedness. BLANKFAZE | (что??) 09:04, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Support. Angela. 05:05, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)
- Support -- sannse (talk) 23:41, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Support. Neutralitytalk 00:54, Dec 25, 2004 (UTC)
- Support. Andre (talk) 08:46, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
- Support. SweetLittleFluffyThing 11:25, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose. Danny 20:55, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Outside opinions:
- See my statement above under Snowspinner's application. --Michael Snow 22:31, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Support. --MPerel 02:09, Dec 22, 2004 (UTC) oops! moved my vote to outside opinions. I originally opposed in the Arbcom Elections, but I've recently become more impressed and think MedCom would be a good opportunity to see what BlankFaze can do. He's definitely a very involved editor and admin and committed to Wikipedia.no offense. --MPerel 20:54, Dec 23, 2004 (UTC)
- Application denied based on opposition from the MC. -- Jwrosenzweig 23:39, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
