Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-03-01 Stow-on-the-Wold

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipedia Mediation Cabal
Article: Stow-on-the-Wold, its talk page
State: Closed
Requested By: Flup
Other Parties: User:86.139.100.200
Mediated By: Snowolf
Comments: Request for third opinion already filed; response already given; the issue seems to be resolved.

Contents

[edit] Mediation Case: 2007-03-01 Stow-on-the-Wold

Please observe Wikipedia:Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator, any other refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Mediation Cabal: Coordination Desk.


[edit] Request Information

Request made by: Flup 15:56, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Where is the issue taking place?
Stow-on-the-Wold and its talk page
Who's involved?
Myself and an anonymous user
What's going on?
I inserted the 'Trivia' section in the article, and the user in question is disputing its presence. I don't have enough experience of Wikipedia to know for sure who's right.
What would you like to change about that?
I'd like an experienced eye cast over the article -- as I say, I'm now not sure who's right.
Would you prefer we work discreetly? If so, how can we reach you?
Best do it through the article's talk page, as the other user is anonymous and doesn't seem to have a static IP address.

[edit] Mediator response

Basically, this seems more appropriate for request for third opinion than it does for mediation. I move to close if there are no objections. TheRingess (talk) 20:47, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

I agree. The user has already filed a request for third opinion, User:Athaenara has already provided one and the issue seems resolved. Happy editing, Snowolf(talk)CONCOI - 22:41, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Compromise offers

This section is for listing and discussing compromise offers.

[edit] Discussion

While using the talk page of the article in question to solve a dispute is encouraged to involve a larger audience, feel free to discuss the case below if that is not possible. Other mediators are also encouraged to join in on the discussion as Wikipedia is based on consensus.