Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-02-04 Nepassa

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipedia Mediation Cabal
Article: Nepassa
State: Closed

Requested By: Mr.Z-man
Other Parties: Mr.Z-man, NipokNek, Moo kau
Mediated By: Summarily closed by Jem 18:44, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments: Closed due to lack of article (see below).

Contents

[edit] Mediation Case: 2007-02-04 Nepassa

Please observe Wikipedia:Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator, any other refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Mediation Cabal: Coordination Desk.


[edit] Request Information

Request made by: Mr.Z-mantalk 20:54, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Where is the issue taking place?
Nepassa and Talk:Nepassa
Who's involved?
Mr.Z-man, NipokNek, Moo kau
What's going on?
Moo kau has written an article about his or her "not well known" religion, about which, no outside information can be found, causing Mr.Z-man and NipokNek to believe it is a hoax. The article was speedily deleted on 00:29, February 4, 2007 because of no context, but was rewritten by the original author with much more information.
What would you like to change about that?
The article should either be properly cited with verifiable information or deleted as a hoax
Would you prefer we work discreetly? If so, how can we reach you?
No, discussion has already begun on the talk page

[edit] Mediator response

Article no longer exists as per the CSD and AfD votes. As such, I am closing this request as there is nothing to mediate. If the rewriting continues, it should be reported here. Jem 18:44, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Compromise offers

This section is for listing and discussing compromise offers.

[edit] Discussion

While using the talk page of the article in question to solve a dispute is encouraged to involve a larger audience, feel free to discuss the case below if that is not possible. Other mediators are also encouraged to join in on the discussion as Wikipedia is based on consensus.

Determination of verifiability and notability is more properly a function of AFD, in my opinion. I have nominated this contested speedy candidate at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nepassa. - BanyanTree 02:03, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
As a named party in this Cabal, I say we should defer to the AFD. I am, however, unfamiliar with the procedure for closing a Cabal prematurly. NipokNek 10:05, 5 February 2007 (UTC)