Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-01-12 Uncommon Dissent
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Wikipedia Mediation Cabal | ||||||||||||
|
Contents |
[edit] Mediation Case: 2007-01-12 Uncommon Dissent
Please observe Wikipedia:Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator, any other refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Mediation Cabal: Coordination Desk.
[edit] Request Information
- Request made by: Tim Smith 22:46, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Where is the issue taking place?
- At Uncommon Dissent.
- Who's involved?
- FeloniousMonk, Guettarda, myself, and to a lesser extent other editors at the article.
- What's going on?
- During the last month and a half, users have removed citation requests, reverted to unsourced claims, reversed uncontroversial changes, reverted without discussion, failed to assume good faith, exhibited incivility, and are now removing dispute tags.
- What would you like to change about that?
- I'd like the users to avoid breaches of Wikiquette and engage constructively so that we can work together to bring the article into compliance with WP:V and WP:NPOV.
- Would you prefer we work discreetly? If so, how can we reach you?
- On my talk page is fine.
[edit] Mediator response
We can't really force them to discuss. Once you get them talking to you, we can mediate. If you can't do that, I will have to close this case. --Ideogram 02:00, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- I move to close the case. TheRingess (talk) 19:42, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Closing. --Ideogram 20:02, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Compromise offers
This section is for listing and discussing compromise offers.
[edit] Discussion
While using the talk page of the article in question to solve a dispute is encouraged to involve a larger audience, feel free to discuss the case below if that is not possible. Other mediators are also encouraged to join in on the discussion as Wikipedia is based on consensus.
