Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-12-01 Coffee table book
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Wikipedia Mediation Cabal | ||||||||||||
|
Contents |
[edit] Mediation Case: 2006-12-01 Coffee table book
Please observe Wikipedia:Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator, any other refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Mediation Cabal: Coordination Desk.
[edit] Request Information
- Request made by: Thesmothete 07:18, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Where is the issue taking place?
- coffee table book
- Who's involved?
- various editors. While I would like to assume good faith, I suspect sockpuppetry
- What's going on?
- various editors are approaching a revert war over two alternate versions of the article. Only one side is using the talk page to discuss changes
- What would you like to change about that?
- I'd like an investigation into the possible sockpuppetry, and if that comes up clean, I'd like to have a two-way discussion about how best to improve the article, given the competing versions.
- Would you prefer we work discreetly? If so, how can we reach you?
- my life is an open book. a coffee table book, perhaps. Please use my talk page to reach me
[edit] Mediator response
I will swoop in and take this case. I thought of a few good comprimises just looking at the report. Antimatter---talk--- 02:11, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
It's been a couple days, and the problem seems to be sorting itself out, no reverts have been made...it may have just been a misguided wikipedian attempting to help out...in any case, if nothing happens for a few days, I'll close the case. Antimatter---talk--- 02:57, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
OK time's up...it's overAntimatter---talk--- 17:22, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Compromise offers
This section is for listing and discussing compromise offers.
[edit] Discussion
While using the talk page of the article in question to solve a dispute is encouraged to involve a larger audience, feel free to discuss the case below if that is not possible. Other mediators are also encouraged to join in on the discussion as Wikipedia is based on consensus.
