Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-11-11 Neil Bush
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Wikipedia Mediation Cabal | ||||||||||||
|
Contents |
[edit] Mediation Case: 2006-11-11 Neil Bush
Please observe Wikipedia:Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator, any other refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Mediation Cabal: Coordination Desk.
[edit] Request Information
- Request made by: BlazinBuggles 01:17, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- Where is the issue taking place?
Talk:Neil Bush/Cabal Mediation
- ...
- Who's involved?
COWICIDE, WIKIPEDIATRIX, 67.190.61.6
- ...
- What's going on?
A few editors insist on having an over-long article section in "Neil Bush" about "Boris Berzovsky" which really belongs under "Boris Berzovsky" (and strangely doesn't seem to warrant inclusion there). COWICIDE, WIKIPEDIATRIX, and 67.190.61.6 have taken to name calling, intimdation, changing talk histories, accusing just about everyone without an extensive history as being a "sockpuppet", reverting NPOV tags, not taking part in dicussion in a constructive, civil manner.
- ...
- What would you like to change about that?
Someone needs to come in and mediate the attitudes. My feeling is that these editors have completely failed in the area of acting in good faith, and will only continue name calling and accusations. Pretty much all attempts to find common ground keep getting rejected.
Personally, I think the "Neil/Boris Connection" only warrants a couple of factual sentences. That idea has been floated several times, only to keep getting knocked down by these few who insist on paint "Boris" in infammatory language and implicate Neil by association.
- ...
- Would you prefer we work discreetly? If so, how can we reach you?
Feel free to work in the open.
- ...
[edit] Mediator response
[edit] Compromise offers
This section is for listing and discussing compromise offers.
[edit] Discussion
While using the talk page of the article in question to solve a dispute is encouraged to involve a larger audience, feel free to discuss the case below if that is not possible. Other mediators are also encouraged to join in on the discussion as Wikipedia is based on consensus.
