Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-10-22 Swiftfox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipedia Mediation Cabal
Article: Talk:Swiftfox
State: Closed
Requested By: Widefox
Other Parties: Kilz
Mediated By: Addhoc (talk contribs)
Comments: Closing case

Contents

[edit] Mediation Case: 2006-10-22 Swiftfox

Please observe Wikipedia:Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator, any other refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Mediation Cabal: Coordination Desk.


[edit] Request Information

Request made by: Widefox 22:21, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Where is the issue taking place?
Talk:Swiftfox
Who's involved?
User:Kilz
What's going on?
WP:NPOV problem Summary leading to failing to reach consensus Summary leading to allegation of breaking policy Summary leading to edit war with Swiftfox blocked, and User:Kilz banned. RfC started. A second edit war started, User:Kilz selectively, then totally blanked User Talk:Kilz, refuses to talk on his talk page, persists in requesting trivial references, refuses to accept all other opinions.
What would you like to change about that?
mediate / advise on 1. preventing more edit wars 2. more effective discussion on Talk:Swiftfox 3. Getting more editors involved (at least RfC).

ban of User:Kilz editing Swiftfox WP:NPOV at least to calm down.

Would you prefer we work discreetly? If so, how can we reach you?
Not important.

[edit] Mediator response

Closing due to inability to help. Geo. 19:13, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
I changed the request. Please reopen. Widefox 09:10, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Please reopen - the article is not advancing due to this dispute. Widefox 11:14, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Compromise offers

This section is for listing and discussing compromise offers.

[edit] Discussion

While using the talk page of the article in question to solve a dispute is encouraged to involve a larger audience, feel free to discuss the case below if that is not possible. Other mediators are also encouraged to join in on the discussion as Wikipedia is based on consensus.