Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-08-16 Neo-Tech (philosophy)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Wikipedia Mediation Cabal | ||||||||||||
|
Contents |
[edit] Mediation Case: 2006-08-16 Neo-Tech (philosophy)
Please observe Wikipedia:Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator, any other refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Mediation Cabal: Coordination Desk.
[edit] Request Information
- Request made by: Bi 20:02, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- Where is the issue taking place?
- Neo-Tech (philosophy).
- Who's involved?
- User:JoeMystical and myself.
- What's going on?
- JoeMystical has been trying to turn the Neo-Tech (philosophy) article into a tract for Neo-Tech, by including only Neo-Tech's side of the story and throwing out all criticisms of Neo-Tech. He has also tried to include lengthy commentary and long-winded quotes from Neo-Tech's literature, and resisted my attempts to summarize them.
- What would you like to change about that?
-
- Allow the article to develop into a truly NPOV one.
- Decide once and for all how much material from Neo-Tech gets to go into the article.
- Stop the edit warring, at any rate.
- Would you prefer we work discreetly? If so, how can we reach you?
- No.
[edit] Mediator response
Okay, really sorry for the delay in reply... we've been a bit backed up lately. Where do you want to discuss? Usually discussion occurs either on the talk page of the article or on my talk page. --The Prophet Wizard of the Crayon Cake 22:32, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi, probably the talk page. That said, there has just been an AfD and there appears to be some consensus towards a merge into the Wallace Ward article. Thanks for taking the case, Addhoc 19:08, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
- And now the article, no longer exists... Addhoc 22:10, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Eh... sorry to hear. Don't let it get you down though... want me to close the case? --The Prophet Wizard of the Crayon Cake 20:49, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for your kind words, however we weren't very close. More of a short term relationship, if you know what I mean. Anyway, yes, closing this case would be entirely appropriate. Thanks again, Addhoc 20:58, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- Okie dokie. Don't hesitate to call me if you need anything. case closed. --The Prophet Wizard of the Crayon Cake 20:58, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for your kind words, however we weren't very close. More of a short term relationship, if you know what I mean. Anyway, yes, closing this case would be entirely appropriate. Thanks again, Addhoc 20:58, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- Eh... sorry to hear. Don't let it get you down though... want me to close the case? --The Prophet Wizard of the Crayon Cake 20:49, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Compromise offers
This section is for listing and discussing compromise offers.
[edit] Discussion
While using the talk page of the article in question to solve a dispute is encouraged to involve a larger audience, feel free to discuss the case below if that is not possible. Other mediators are also encouraged to join in on the discussion as Wikipedia is based on consensus.
