Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-06-25 CSICOP
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Mediation Case: 2006-06-25 CSICOP
Please observe Wikipedia:Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator, any other refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Mediation Cabal: Coordination Desk.
[edit] Request Information
- Request made by: KarlBunker 11:22, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- Where is the issue taking place?
- Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal
- Who's involved?
- KarlBunker, User:Davkal
- What's going on?
- 2-person edit conflict. After 8,000 + words of debate, we've stopped making progress, and Davkal is becoming (mildly, so far) abusive.
- What would you like to change about that?
- I believe Davkal is pushing a POV, and has become increasingly resistant to logical discourse. Perhaps an outside opinion would help. I haven't registered this in 3rd Opinion (or whatever it's called) because some time investigating the article's subject may be required.
- Would you prefer we work discreetly? If so, how can we reach you?
- Non-discreetly on my Talk page is okay.
[edit] Mediator response
New mediator needed I have put this case back into the in need of mediators section, hopefully a new mediator will be back here to respond shortly. I believe the discussion was occuring on the talk page of the article in question. Cowman109Talk 22:24, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks; yes to both--we need a new mediator, and the discussion is in the Talk page. Some issues have been resolved, so a new mediator shouldn't need to read through the whole lengthy discussion to date. KarlBunker 01:26, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
This case has been resolved. Ideogram 01:58, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Compromise offers
This section is for listing and discussing compromise offers.
[edit] Discussion
While using the talk page of the article in question to solve a dispute is encouraged to involve a larger audience, feel free to discuss the case below if that is not possible. Other mediators are also encouraged to join in on the discussion as Wikipedia is based on consensus.
