Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-05-30 Razer (Robot)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please observe Wikipedia:Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator, any other refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Mediation Cabal: Coordination Desk.
[edit] Request Information
- Request made by: User:Lucy-Marie
- Where is the issue taking place?
- Razer (Robot)
- Who's involved?
- User:Lucy-marie and User:Lenin & McCarthy
- What's going on?
This step should be sort as an ongoing content dispute resolution, beofre rash decisions to go to arbitration are requested.
[edit] Proposal of common ground and personal veiws by Lucy-Marie
For my personal taste of the edits being longer there should be as much information avaliable to new users who do not know much if anything about the subject. as i advocate more inforamtion is a better page then there ahould be a was of making the pages easy to read but also to caontain the maximum amount of information possible. I think that the pages on wikipedia should be of a liquid nature. by that i mean that each page should have a form of its own indivduality and not one of that of a 'standadised' page generic form advocated by L&M. i understand that the pages my be easier to read but it is not necessary to remove absolutly everthing about all the battles, and the have noteworthy battles.if this was ot be the case what constitutes a note worthy battle. some people will argue like myself all battles are notworthy as thay show how that robot progressed thorugh history. others will say that only a grand final will be noteworthy, and some will say no battle is noteworthy. My opinion is tat the more information avaliable the betteras it can then be seen as to the precise nature of the history the robot had. also for people who view these as too hard to read there should be asection such as in the tonado page of a summary aswell. i think there should be a merging of both ideas rather than all down one road.Lucy-marie 12:22, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Modest proposal by Lenin & McCarthy
I'm glad to see we're all willing to talk. Sorry for the delay in my reply.
I have given it some thought, and I believe that if Lucy-marie wishes for Wikipedia to hold a full summary of all battles for robots, said summaries should go into a new article. Therefore, I propose that the longer battle summaries be moved to Battle History of Razer (robot) whilst the "Noteworthy Battles" section of the articles are removed from the main articles of the robots. This, a standard form can be maintained while allowing for the amount of information desired.
As for the other major cause of dispute, I hope that this may settle the disputed results (Sumo Basho et al) in this article and others.
Finally, I would like to resquest that if Lucy-marie wishes for the sucession boxes of disuted authenticity in Razer to remain, she should provide some evidence of the events described taking place. Lenin & McCarthy 16:10, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
I was recieving my information directly from the razer website but they have modified the site now so the information has been changed a great deal and most has been removed.Lucy-marie 16:32, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
