User talk:McPhail
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- /Archive 1: April 2005 - March 2006
- /Archive 2: March 2006 - June 2006
- /Archive 3: June 2006 - October 2006
- /Archive 4: October 2006 - February 2007
Contents |
[edit] Hey
Long time no talk. Your back to editing I see? Thats great. Well, have fun editing. Cheers, —mikedk9109SIGN 15:06, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
hey man, this is the guy who changed your Finlay wrestling move page, sorry to modify your territory, but an Emerald Fusion is a completely different move from an Air Raid Crash which is what the Celtic Cross is. An Emerald Fusion is a Scoop Side Piledriver, almost like a Mitchinoku Driver II from the side. I know Michael Cole or Tazz or Josh Matthews might have called the Celtic Cross an Emerald Fusion at some point, but they were just looking for a name, so they attributed that to the wrong move. I removed it because it was confusing and misleading. Sorry for any misunderstood purposes. Ill avoid your stuff from now on. Peace - PozzoTN
[edit] Glen Jacobs
screw you mcphail! i did not vandalise glen jacobs page. i just put the real name of his finisher there! why dont you look at what someone did to paul wight's(big show's) page!
This user also personally attacked you on my talk page, I left him a warning template about it. Keep on keepin' on... Bmg916 Speak to Me 19:08, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Professional_wrestling#Country_names_in_infoboxes.
I have brought it up, the country names were there before, I don't know why you keep removing them for no reason at all. You have obviously been trying to change Regal is billed not just from Blackpool but he is always billed from Blackpool England, so it was correct and was like that for ages before the England part was removed by someone. For Layla El, she was born in London, England so I put down as stated London England in the infobox. For ages that was the norm on all biographies, I don't know why you are changing rules on biographies, but I have brought it up on the wrestling part, because for what ever odd reason you have in your head. You are doing it wrong in my book. Govvy 20:03, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Regarding edit to Chris Hamrick
It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Chris Hamrick. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox.>>> 198.138.41.54 21:51, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] John Frankle III
An editor has added a "{{prod}}" template to the article John Frankle III, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but it is not believed it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has been explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. MadMax 05:51, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Vanessa Harding
An editor has added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Vanessa Harding, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but it is not believed it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has been explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. MadMax 06:04, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] List of World Wrestling Entertainment pay-per-view buys
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article List of World Wrestling Entertainment pay-per-view buys, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. (I am notifying - I did not nominate for deletion) User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 17:06, 7 April 2007 (UTC)