User talk:Mceder
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 Archives |
|---|
[edit] Ogham Coincidence
Hi mceder I noticed your interest and remembered a program i had seen on TV about ogham insciptions on late roman/early saxon town houses of the roman name and info of the owner of the house(in latin but using ogham script). Thought it was very strange and a recent discovery i'll try and remember more info, i know it was a BBC program called "Meet the Ancestors" and was a one hour on a romano-british town.Hypnosadist 00:25, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Which edits are you referring to? Black people listening to rap music is wickid controversial d00d Josh16 00:48, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The structure of Hezbollah article
Hi,
There is discussion about the structure of Hezbollah article. Please read all of them and tell us your idea.--Sa.vakilian 03:43, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Not sure what happend.
First time it said a minor edit when it was not(A sign of vandalism). 2nd time I'm not sure what happend I think it might of been a mistake with somthing elese.---Scott3 Talk Contributions Count: 950+ 01:09, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] terrorist
is a subjective term. There is no generally accepted definition. Thus the quotation marks. Rm uk 03:55, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Talk:Hezbollah/Archive lead
Hi. Thank you for this effort.
I want to know you move the text to this archive or copy it.--Sa.vakilian 04:39, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- I prefer to copy the text because we need a chronological archive too.--Sa.vakilian 02:24, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Removal of Terrorist category
I agree that this category should not exist, but I am concerned about the reverting happening on the Baruch Goldstein article. I saw you have tried to get the category deleted before but was unable to reach consensus and that is a shame.
There is no official policy on Wikipedia that states to avoid the word Terrorist. There is Wikipedia:Words to avoid, which is a guide... And it argues both for and against the use of said word! What it does state is that the word should be used in a manner that describes who is calling them what. Is a notable organisation calling Baruch Goldstein a terrorist and are there reputable sources that backs that up? If so, I believe the category should remain. mceder (u t c) 16:44, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
- I agree he is a terrorist. However, I think such a category creates a list of "Terrorists according to Wikipedia" which is a violation of WP:NPOV. Whether sources are provided is irrelevent in my opinion; a category of 'Accused terrorists' would be OK, but by adding someone to such a category as simply 'Terrorists' basically says Wikipedia agrees with the source, which it cannot do. Thus, while he is clearly a terrorist, there are lots of other people that belong on the list that are not there because some people object to their being labelled as a terrorist. So long as this subjectivity continues, it is not fair to label anyone as a terrorist 'according to Wikipedia.' —Aiden 19:45, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Sweden
This WikiProject is now officially started. I suggest you first read the new scope and goals of the project. If you still agree, please sign att the members section.
Fred-Chess 18:31, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Organizational Chart of the Hezbollah
Hi, could you please help us with making this chart in wikipeida:[1]--Sa.vakilian 03:36, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- That's great. Thanks a lot. But I guess we have some problem with copy right rule. Because it has derived from "In the path of Hezbollah" by Ahmad Nezar Hamze and on the other hand its reliability depends on that book.--Sa.vakilian 11:31, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Moving info. to a new article
I made Funding of Hezbollah and moved some part of Hezbollah#Funding to it. It may cause some problem about ref. Please check both of them.--Sa.vakilian 06:29, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Verifying the references
Salam Alaykum
Could you please help us in Talk:Hezbollah#Verifying the references ?--Sa.vakilian 03:55, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Please come and help us to finish verification of Hezbollah references.talk:Hezbollah#Verifying the references--Sa.vakilian 16:16, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Nomination as a good article
Salam. I think Hezbollah has reached to good article criteria and I want to nominate it. Please write your idea in talk:Hezbollah#Good article nomination--Sa.vakilian(t-c) 06:39, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Al-Manar
Salam. This article is nominated as a GA while it hasn't reached GA criteria. I wrote a review and put On Hold tag on it:talk:Al-Manar#Good enough?. We should improve it in a week. Can you please help us with it? God bless you.--Sa.vakilian(t-c) 04:56, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
