User talk:Maximusnukeage
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You've uploaded an image of Plenty Uptopp which is under copyright. Unless you can demonstrate that you hold the copyright to that photo, or that it has been released into the public domain or under a license that is compatible with the GFDL, it will be deleted. Drop a note on the image's talk page if you have any objections. — Gwalla | Talk 06:21, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Hello there and welcome to Wikipedia! While we're generally an inclusive lot, we ask that any images you upload be demonstrably public domain, fair use, or otherwise legal for us to have. Images snagged from porn sites generally don't fall under those categories. Also, you may be interested to know that the site from which you linked the picture of Ms. Price attempts to load Malware on one's computer. Please consider running an Ad-Aware scan on your computer at once. Cheers, Mackensen 07:12, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
If you are unfamiliar with Wikipedia's rules and regulations regarding copyrighted materials, please take a look at the Contributing FAQ and the Copyrights guide. I must warn you that if you continue to upload content that you are not entitled to contribute under the GFDL, and continue to be uncommunicative, you may be blocked from editing.
I have locked this talk page to keep it from being blanked until this has been sorted out. Please reply at this subpage. Thank you. — Gwalla | Talk 02:13, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
David Jonathan, You repeatedly ignored the requests to use only copyright-free images. (as seen in the history of this page) Unless you cease doing this, you will be banned from editing in wikipedia. Mikkalai 03:18, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I appologise. the rules concerning what is copyrighted and how to cite things are complicated. I appologise.
MaximusNukeage 05:14, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Please understand that there is BIG money in the pics of these lovely boobs. You live in the USA, aren't you? Lawyers can sue your sorry ass off you (or, what is much more probable, off wikipedia) once they get tipped. And the copyright rule to follow is very simple: if you don't know, then it is copyrighted. To be a bit more specific, all non-governmental is copyrighted unless explicitely stated. So, if you find a photo of a pretty hooker in FBI archives, bring it here :-) Mikkalai 06:36, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
those rules are simple, I should be able to understand those MaximusNukeage 04:39, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- By the way, a good source of 100% non-copyrighted images is Library of Congress (*The Library of Congress website). Each image there is supplied with its copyright status, description and reference number that may be placed into the wikipedia image page. I fetched quite few pics from there myself. Mikkalai 04:52, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
If someone sends an email to the copyright holder and they grant permission, then you can use it?
- Best of all, if they grant permission to use under GFDL license or for free use. Please read Wikipedia:Image use policy for more details. Mikkalai 15:59, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] NYC meetup
Hi maxnuke, fellow texan ex-pat here... a meetup in NY is planned for the weekend of Nov 13: Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC. I hope you can make it :) +sj+ 21:50, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
no thanks MaximusNukeage 18:13, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Just in case, there is a meetup scheduled for Sunday, December 12 as well. (same link) – Ram-Man (comment) (talk)[[]] 23:29, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)
[edit] User Pic
Hi. I just found your user pic and, as part of the wikipedia image tagging project, I marked it as yours and noted that you release it into the public domain for copyright purposes. If this is inaccurate, please feel free to correct it. --InShaneee 18:09, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Isambard_Prince.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Isambard_Prince.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}
.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 21:33, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Stanley_H._Tweedle.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Stanley_H._Tweedle.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}
.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 21:54, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Suit1.jpg listed for deletion
Fightindaman 00:30, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Cowardly
If I am correct, it was you who redirected 'cowardly' to North Korea. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to cowardly. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. . --Ionius Mundus 02:07, 29 August 2006 (UTC)