Talk:Maxi Mounds

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 October 2006. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

Archives Archive1

[edit] Last name, number of photos

In regards to first name/last name usage: per the Manual of Style, Mounds should be referred to by her last name after the initial mention of her entire name.

In regards to the multiple photos: per the Manual of Style, "Some general guidelines which should be followed in the absence of a compelling reason not to: ... Avoid sandwiching text between two images facing each other." -- Joie de Vivre 16:53, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Third Opinion

Don't put so many images on one article unless it is rather long, or they all serve a particularly important function. All edits should be made to conform to the MOS, and should be altered if needed. Please talk to the IP on their talk page and attempt to put up a negotiation. If they won't respond and they continue, you may need full protection for disputes. In short, remove some images and make sure that the article conforms to the Manual of Style. bibliomaniac15 05:19, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Edits for protected article

Well, I think full protection for the article was overkill and that semi-pro would've been enough, but that's the admin's call and I'm not about to argue too strenously. I see a pair of images got deleted upstream - Image:DSC00054.jpg and Image:Dsc03112.jpg - resulting in a pair of redlinks in this article. Can those redlinks be removed from the article? Tabercil 03:32, 23 February 2007 (UTC)