User talk:Matt-rex

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Archbishop Kevin McDonald 2 Stonyhurst update 3 Orphaned fair use image (Image:Southarms.gif) 4 Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot 5 Other 6 Removal skepticism

[edit] Archbishop Kevin McDonald

You stated on the talk page of this article that you hold the rights to it. Could you please send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org, confirming that you have released it under the GFDL? Thank you, --Robth^Talk 05:40, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

I have processed the email and restored the article. --Robth^Talk 14:50, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Stonyhurst update

Hi,

Many thanks for your work fleshing out the Stonyhurst article. I started it ages ago, but it had rather stagnated. I was there 1972-81 - are you a contemporary of mine, or a youngster?

--Dunstan ^talk 18:16, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Many thanks for note - got a few more things to add, and a bit more re-working. Hope that's cool. Just added a photo too - what do you think? Also I have a new image for the front of Stonyhurst - would you like me to add and replace the other one? I am a youngster, OS 91 - 98, but studied Stonyhurst history whilst there, and since. Thanks for your note. Well done on starting the page! Matt - London 09:33, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

So long as the information you're adding is from sources which are out of copyright. As for images, the more the merrier (within reason), so long as they're yours. The piccie of St Peter's is slightly crooked - will straighten it up when I get a few minutes. --Dunstan ^talk 11:20, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Absolutely! Facts are from my own research - part of my PHD. Thanks for offer to edit photo.Matt - London 11:38, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Southarms.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Southarms.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 04:49, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs David Allen Zubik John R. Quinn Church of the Immaculate Heart of Mary Diocese of Jaipur River Ribble Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany Frederick William Freking John Patrick Treacy Sylvester Donovan Ryan Archbishop of Birmingham Diocese of Rochester George Errington Jerome Edward Listecki Diocese of Raphoe Roman Catholic Diocese of Yakima Michael Jack Padiham Nederland 3 Roman Catholic Diocese of Monterey-Fresno

Cleanup Sideshow Bob's Last Gleaming Roman Catholic Diocese of Charlotte Adam Merge George Gipp Haileybury and Imperial Service College Friends of Holy Trinity Cathedral Parnell Add Sources Cottingley Fairies John R. McGann (Bishop) R. Walker Nickless Wikify Haridwar Mission (Christian) Niña Expand Michael Jennings Catholic Diocese of Hong Kong Eureka College

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 20:09, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Other

Critic of faith healing, such as James Randi's book The Faith Healers, criticized Father Ralph DiOrio, who is a Vatican-approved healer.^[1] DiOrio, influenced by Kathryn Kuhlman, claims he can cure such things as arthritis, but has never supplied any subjects to give to proof to this.^[2]

[edit] Removal skepticism

Why did you remove?[1] Your edit summary was "removed content, as this should be added to Miracles of Lourdes or Our Lady of Lourdes," those "articles" are redirects. There is no need to remove that material when discussing the Sanctuary of Lourdes. C56C 06:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

The reason why I deleted this, is because the article Lourdes is about the town - sceptism should be kept to "Miracles of Lourdes" - as its an article on the sceptism of the miracles. How can you be a sceptic of a town? Matt - London 14:54, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

As the article discusses the Sanctuary of Lourdes. Also there is no other article about the Sanctuary of Lourdes, and so mentioning its most famous aspects as well as skepticism about those aspects is a must. The content is not about being skeptical about a town. It's being skeptical about something that has made the town famous. Arbustoo 04:43, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

I agree it discusses the Sanctuary of Lourdes. However, Lourdes is a generic article about the various areas of Lourdes, and not particularly about the miracles etc - whether they were true or not. Scepticism should be placed in an article about the miracles. I have opened a dicussion on the Lourdes page Matt - London 10:36, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

What do you not understand? If purported miracles are going to be mention, then those who doubt those miracles will be mentioned. If you remove it again without reason, it is considered vandalism. C56C 19:46, 9 April 2007 (UTC)